The physical form of Earth definitely influences how life
evolves on Earth. You can't argue that ice ages and the birth of shallow seas in
the middle of continents changed what life forms survived and thrived. But what
about the other possibility?
Question of the Day –
Does life have an effect on the physical form of Earth?
What about the Dustbowl? In the 1930’s, the bottom fell out
of the wheat market and farmers in Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas abandoned their
land. Farmland that isn't farmed is no longer held in place by roots. The farmers had
plowed under the grasslands that had kept the soil in place for thousands of
years, but a couple of years of drought and a surplus of corn and wheat led to
a national disaster. By 1938, 5 inches of topsoil had been lost from more than
26 million acres of farmland.
Other life has also had an effect on the physical Earth.
Organic rich sedimentary rocks are formed when living things die, decay, and
under the influences of pressure heat, and time come to form specific products.
The rocks and other end products are considered organic rich only if they are
greater than 3% organic material. You might have heard of these end products - coal
and oil shale.
These are interesting examples, but allow me to relate a newly
written story. It's still a hypothesis, but there is a lot of data that
supports this fresh idea of the massive effects which life has had on the
planet. How massive you ask? Let me give you this hint – it doesn’t get much
bigger.
The earliest life on Earth appeared more than 3.8 billion
years ago. Oxygen was very scarce in the atmosphere, so these organisms did not
use oxygen as an electron acceptor in the production of cellular energy. The
earliest bacteria necessarily used those things that it had at hand, things
like methane or other chemicals.
But these photosynthetic bacteria did release oxygen –
something that had not happened on Earth previously. The oxygen that was
produced didn’t just float around in the atmosphere; there were other compounds
that were ready to react with the O2.
One thing that the Earth had in abundance 3.8 billion years
ago was hydrogen. But hydrogen is light. A thin atmosphere could be made thinner
by losing hydrogen to outer space, so combining hydrogen and oxygen to produce
water was a fortunate way to keep some of this hydrogen on the planet and to
increase the water supply. We will see just how important this was in a few
paragraphs.
Other things early Earth had in great supply were iron and
basalt. Basalt is the rock formed by the eruption of volcanoes and interaction
of the magma with the atmosphere. The oxygen produced via photosynthesis (and
much of the oxygen already present) quickly reacted with iron in the earth and
lava and with the basalt.
The basalt and oxygen underwent a much longer process in the
earth’s crust, changing from igneous rock to metamorphic rock (meta = change
and morph = form). Basalt or clay + minerals + terrestrial O2 + water,
form granite. Is it a coincidence that the only place in the universe we have
seen granite is right here on Earth? Sounds like photosynthetic life had an
influence on the kinds of rocks located on this particular planet. But wait, it
gets bigger.
What were the results of this density difference? Floating
granite formed continents, while heavier basalt and eclogite formed ocean
floors. Yes, photosynthetic bacteria influenced the formation of the
continents! Photosynthesis had effects on water, on
terrestrial oxygen, on granite formation and density – and
therefore they effected the physical form of Earth.
This theory was proposed by Minik Rosing in his 2006 paper.
I actually read about it in a thriller paperback called The Last Good Man, by Anders Klarland and
Jacob Weinreich. Intrigued by the author’s discussion, I checked on it
and learned a whole bunch. Strange, but a murder mystery was the beginnings of
this post.
I did another literature search, looking for papers that
talked about the photosynthesis-granite theory and paper. I couldn’t find any.
This made me wonder if the hypothesis had been refuted, or if the scientific
community just didn’t buy it. I contacted a couple of well-known geologists and
asked about the state of the theory.
I laid out the idea as I understood it and asked if I was
getting the point and if the point was worth getting. They both agreed that the
theory is alive and well and has been well accepted. Amazing – almost nothing
this revolutionary is well received at first. And it shouldn’t be easy; every
step forward should be scrutinized and tested to make sure it isn’t a step
backward.
So photosynthetic bacteria are responsible for the
continents. Does the story end there? Nope, there’s more.
Most forms of life on Earth at this time were unable to deal
with higher concentrations of oxygen. What makes oxygen so great for cellular
respiration is that it easily takes electrons from other atoms, or can combine
easily to share electrons. This is also what makes it dangerous. It can damage other
molecules are hinder their function by combing with them or altering their
structure. This is oxidative damage.
The increased oxygen in the environment starting killing
most of the forms of life. This was such an important happening that biologists
gave it a name – the Oxygen Crisis, the Great Oxygenation Event, the Oxygen
Catastrophe. The Great Oxidation, or the Big Bad Breath (OK, I made that one
up). Only the organisms that
evolved a mechanism to deal with oxidative damage continued to survive and
change. Eventually, some came to use the oxygen in their metabolism.
So life has affected the physical form of the earth, and of
course life has affected the later forms of life. But there is even more to
this story, including how both processes are at work at the same time.
Just recently a study indicated that trees in the rainforest can sense when they are receiving too much sunlight and are getting too hot. They will then release chemicals that promote cloud formation by acting as
seeds for vapor to form into water droplets. The clouds reduce the amount of
sunlight reaching the trees and cool them down. Smart guys those trees.
So early life built up Earth’s continents, and then
proceeded to help tear them back down. There is a balance between the
weathering of rock and the formation of rock. And this, in and of itself, has
also affected life.
When granite weathers, it releases some of the minerals it
contains, heavy minerals that were brought up from the mantle. These heavy
metals and minerals are able to act in chemical reactions, including the banded
iron forms that were made during the initially increase in oxygen formation.
Some organisms managed to find ways to use them as they were spread over the ground
and the surface of the shallow seas.
A new study indicates that the weathering of granite and the release of minerals was a crucial event in the development of life on Earth. Carbon release and heavy metal release, especially iron, apparently stimulated and increase in complexity of life forms on Earth. What was the most crucial increase in complexity brought about by weathering? The evolution of eukaryotes about 2.0-1.6 billion years ago!
Next week, life on a smaller scale. Can a plant as small as a grain of salt really be considered a whole plant?
Parnell, J., Hole, M., Boyce, A., Spinks, S., & Bowden, S. (2012). Heavy metal, sex and granites: Crustal differentiation and bioavailability in the mid-Proterozoic Geology, 40 (8), 751-754 DOI: 10.1130/G33116.1
Paasonen, P., Asmi, A., Petäjä, T., Kajos, M., Äijälä, M., Junninen, H., Holst, T., Abbatt, J., Arneth, A., Birmili, W., van der Gon, H., Hamed, A., Hoffer, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Richard Leaitch, W., Plass-Dülmer, C., Pryor, S., Räisänen, P., Swietlicki, E., Wiedensohler, A., Worsnop, D., Kerminen, V., & Kulmala, M. (2013). Warming-induced increase in aerosol number concentration likely to moderate climate change Nature Geoscience DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1800
Rosing, M., Bird, D., Sleep, N., Glassley, W., & Albarede, F. (2006). The rise of continents—An essay on the geologic consequences of photosynthesis Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 232 (2-4), 99-113 DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.01.007
No comments:
Post a Comment