James Watson and Francis Crick, along with Maurice Wilkins
and Rosalind Franklin, worked out the structure of DNA in 1953. Years before,
a Dr. Avery had shown that nucleic acids alone could be transferred between
organisms to change their phenotype. This meant that it was the DNA, not the
proteins, that were responsible for heredity.
Watson and Crick wanted to identify DNA's structure
because, as is the case so often in biology, knowing the structure is crucial
to knowing the function. The way DNA was put together would give clues as to
how it passed on information to the daughter cells.
Watson and Crick were the exception in that they didn’t really do
any of their own experimentation in this quest for the structure of DNA. They
built some models based on other peoples’ data, and made some great insights
that led them to the truth.
We know now that DNA is a double helix, but in the early
1950’s, no one had any idea about this. Rosalind Franklin had a structural
picture of DNA that, when shown to Watson by Wilkins, immediately caused him to
know that DNA was a helix.
The constituents and order of the building blocks of DNA
(nucleotides) had been worked out by organic chemist Alexander Todd in the
1940’s– phosphate group, sugar, base. But were the phosphates on the inside of
the helix or were the bases? And how were the different strands held together?
Watson and Crick thought DNA might be a triple helix. Don’t
laugh, so did other eminent scientists, including Linus Pauling, the Wizard of
Cal Tech, who would eventually be awarded not one, but two Nobel prizes.
About this same time, Crick and Watson were reminded of the
conclusion of Chargaff that each cell contained the same amounts of A (adenine) and T (thymine), as
well as the same amounts of G (guanine) and C (cytidine). Jerry Donohue, another addition from the
land of Linus Pauling who liked to flap his lips, pointed out that A could bind
to T through their hydrogens, and G could base pair with C.
You notice that nowhere have we talked about Watson and
Crick’s data; so far they had only built a triple helix model with the
phosphates in the center – and it was really wrong.
The final piece of the puzzle was a May, 1952 X-ray
crystallography image of DNA made by Rosalind Franklin that was shown to Watson
by her boss. Immediately, this image put to rest any doubts that DNA was a
helix, and it gave accurate measurements for how wide the molecule was and the
distance between complete turns.
Using this data, Watson and Crick returned to their model
making and solved the puzzle in short order (by March, 1953). Their April 1953
paper was an exception in itself; it was only one page long. It contains
the most understated sentences in the history of science since Alexander Fleming said,
“Hey, all my bacteria are dead.”
The consistent base pairing of A and T or G and C led them
to write, “It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have
postulated suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material.” All
this meant was that they realized that the DNA structure was a perfect explanation
for how it replicates so that the genetic information is passed on to each new
generation. Ho hum.
So that’s it - DNA is a double helix molecule with the bases
on the inside. Well, not quite. I can think of many exceptions to these rules,
but let’s talk about just a couple or three. DNA comes in at least three
different double helices, A, B, and Z. This was apparent early in the studies
of DNA, but only molecular biologists ever remember it.
The A form was the first form to be imaged by Rosalind
Franklin. Since it was compact, it gave a muddied X-ray image, as seen in the
picture. Information on water content and the length of each turn was also
disturbing, and through of Watson and Crick for a while. The aha! image that Watson got a look at was
Franklin’s attempt at B DNA, and it gave him all the information he needed to
finish the model.
Z DNA does occur in nature, but usually not as the sole form
of DNA. When certain runs of bases are encountered (called CpG, for runs of
purine/pyrimidine), and when the salt concentration in the region is high, the
DNA can locally switch to a left-handed turn helix. What we usually see is a
B-Z-B region.
Using this tendency of B DNA to switch to Z-DNA under the
right conditions, some researchers are using carbon nanodots to create optical
logic gates; they light up if bound to Z form, and don’t if bound to B form. By
controlling the conditions and the sequence of small runs of DNA, you can turn
the lights on and off, similar to the 1’s and 0’s of computers. You get it now
– this has the potential to become a DNA-based nano-computer!
The A, B, and Z forms of DNA aren’t the only exception to
the structure of this nucleic acid. These three are all double helices, but
that doesn’t mean that all DNA exists
as a double helix.
Some DNA is single stranded (ss). In every cell of every
organism there is transient formation of ssDNA when it is replicated,
transcribed, recombined, and repaired. SSDNA is also seen in some viruses, the
best known and first discovered of these being the parvovirus.
Fifth disease is usually self-limiting, but new evidence is
suggesting that there can be long term ramifications of a B19 infection. In
2013 alone, case studies have been published linking parvovirus B19 to acute
kidney infections, neurologic complications, muscle cell death, and a purple
tissue swelling called Wells Syndrome. All from a single strand of DNA.
Admit it, you laughed at Watson, Crick, and Pauling when you
discovered that at first they all thought DNA was a triple helix. Who’s
laughing now? Of course they still got the orientation wrong, with the
phosphates on the outside. If you feel the need, go ahead and snicker at the
guys with the three Nobel Prizes. How many have you got?
A newer discovery is quadruplex DNA; four strands come
together to form a rectangle-like structure, where four bases bond
together. It has been know for a
few years that these complexes exist in the telomeres of mammals. Telomeres are
on the ends of chromosomes and need special consideration to be replicated and
preserved. The quadruplex structures aid in the preservation of our chromosome
ends. This is important, as dysfunctions in telomere replication are thought to
responsible for up to 85% of cancers.
Quadruplex structures are also being predicted and seen
outside the telomeres. A new study used an antibody that recognizes quadruplex
DNA to visualize and quantify these structures in living human cells. Their
data shows that many DNA quadruplexes are associated with cell cycle
progression, suggesting that manipulating them could become important in cancer
treatment. And like clockwork, evidence also shows that the c-myc protocancer
gene forms quadruplexes as well – is there any structure this gene won't form?
Next week we can continue our look at nucleic acids by
looking at the exceptions to the rules of the building blocks, nucleotides. It’s not quite as easy as uracil (U) for RNA and thymine (T) for
DNA. And why is U used only in RNA anyway?
For
more information or classroom activities, see:
Search
for the structure of DNA –
DNA
activities –
Forms
of DNA –
Triplex
DNA –
No comments:
Post a Comment