But in some cases, it’s much easier to tell the guys from
the gals, so much so that sometimes scientists misidentify them as different
species. The differences between how males and females look and how they look
is called sexual dimorphism (di = two, and morph = form) and it can range from the subtle to the fantastic.
We have been talking about bilateral asymmetry in the past
few weeks, and our next examples of bilateral asymmetry require a discussion of
sexual dimorphism – a subject full of its own exceptions.
The mildest form of sexual dimorphism is when the difference
lies in just in reproductive organs. This may or may not be visible to the naked eye. Take the American white pelican (Pelicanus erythrorhynochos). On average,
the males are just slightly larger than the females, but you couldn’t tell this
by looking at them. Only their reproductive organs tell them apart and the external portion of the cloaca of a male looks just like that of a female. Maybe you could separate them another
way – I hear only guys like the Three Stooges.
A better example would be the spotted hyena (Crocuta
crocuta). The females probably like the Stooges more than the males,
because this species has females that are extremely masculinized. Many studies
have been done on just how this species is unique among mammals in its lack of
sexual dimorphism.
A 2014 review discusses how the female external
reproductive tissues look just like
the males. Scientists have studied hyena individuals for years assuming they were males until
all of suddenly they give birth to a litter of pups! The review goes over the
data that shows that much of the external genitalia are masculinized before the
reproductive organs can even start producing hormones, so much of the
similarities between males and females is genetically driven. But not all –
certain aspects could be stopped with anti-androgen drugs.
A 2012 study showed that spotted hyenas have 5x lower levels
of SHBG (sex hormone binding globulin). This protein binds up estrogens and
androgens and regulates how available they are to the tissues. The spotted
hyena has a slight mutation in the gene. The result is that lower overall levels of that gene product
(protein) are made. With less regulating protein, the androgens are free to
strongly masculinize both the tissues and the behaviors of the females. They
are bigger, stronger, and more aggressive than the males. This, along with
their external reproductive organs looking so similar to males makes them a
complete exception in the mammals.
But it isn’t always so hard to tell boy from girl. There are
several external body features that may help if you find yourself
needing to tell, say, a boy wombat from a girl wombat.
Size (mass, length, height, muscularity) is a common
sexually dimorphic trait. In mammals and birds, the males are most often larger
than the females, but our talk of spotted hyenas from above tells you that
isn’t always the case. The exceptions carry over to birds as well. When the
gender that is normally smaller in most species of a phylum turns out to be
bigger, this is called reversed sexual size dimorphism or just reversed size dimorphism (RSD).
which was investigated in 2005. The study found that the small-male hypothesis
was supported – that males got smaller to become better foragers, while the
females remained large or got larger as prey for their chicks got larger. The
study concluded that RSD was a results of natural selection for resource and
niche management rather than a selection based on who to mate with (sexual
selection).
Amongst the mammals that follow the rule of larger males,
the biggest size dimorphism is seen in the southern
elephant seal (Mirounga leonina).
The males weigh 8-10x more than the females, and they have a huge proboscis
that the females don’t have. When hanging out together, they are often mistaken
for an adult and a juvenile....unless she’s a trophy wife and he’s 50
years older than her. Then it’s completely believable.
Outside of mammals and birds, phyla generally have females
that are larger than males. That’s if there is a difference in size between the
sexes at all - many species don’t have sexual size dimorphism. One that does is
the golden silk spider (Nephila clavipes) has a female that 35-70x the mass of the male and is 7-8x longer than he is. Many spiders have larger
females.
A 2013 study showed that the
web contains a biogel that holds the air in the web. It can pull oxygen out of
the water and replenish the air in the bell, so the spider can live and hunt
under water without ever coming to the surface again.
Often, male and female animals have differences in secondary sex characteristics – traits that distinguish the two
genders but are not related directly to the reproductive organs. Colors or
ornaments (like wattles, antlers, etc.) can be used to tell the differences
between males and females. These are phenotypic (pheno = observed and type
= characteristic) differences; they make the two animals look different, not
just be of different size.
Color is a good example of a phenotypic sexual dimorphism (sexual
dichromatism). Cardinals are red (male) or kind of grayish-brown (female), while male and female
Eclectus parrots (Eclectus roratus) are both colorful,
they just have completely different coloration patterns (see picture below). Mandrill (a type of
primate) males have coloration on their face and bums, while the females are
basically all one color.
Why would it be
advantageous for species to show a sexual dimorphism – like size, phenotype, or even
behavior? There are sexual dimorphic behaviors, like male penguins presenting
pebbles to prospective mates or male manakin
birds dancing for females. Some birds dance better than others – at least
according to the females, so this is a selection criterion just like other
sexual dimorphisms, but these are beyond our discussion today.
Sexual selection (mate selection) criteria are good reasons for sexual dimorphisms. If
a male (or every once in a while a female) has enough energy to make ornaments
(or even better, larger ornaments like horns, wattles, etc.), then they must be good at finding food or
have good genes. This would give those with larger ornaments a reproductive
advantage and would select for genes that promote larger ornaments. Over time,
there would be greater and greater separation between males and females.
Likewise, larger
tusks or antlers would allow a male to compete better against other males. This
would again help separate those with supposedly stronger genes. Winning a
battle might reflect bigger muscles, again a sign of better energy procurement
or the ability to resist disease. All in all, he’d be a better mate for
a female looking for physical survival traits. The more a species starts to
control its environment (ie. humans), the less these survival or strength genes matter.
This
is a form of sexual behavior dimorphism in the
manakin
bird. The male dances for the female. Now we
know
where Michael Jackson got the idea for the
moonwalk.
|
A new paper shows that
plumage color in birds is often related to survival advantage - not mate
selection advantage. Plumage can be used for camouflage, when males live in slightly different environments than females. The alternative - if they don’t survive, they probably won’t mate. On the other hand, sexual size dimorphisms can promote stronger mate selection if the
males are bigger (sexual selection), or may allow for the mothers to hunt better and find more
food for offspring if it is they that are larger (natural selection).
In some arthropods,
there is often a sexual size dimorphism where the female is larger. This would
allow them to lay more eggs – more eggs means more potential offspring might
survive to reproduce themselves. Likewise, female humans have a wider pelvis to
allow for passage of the baby through the birth canal - a dimorphism not associated with mate selection. Males don’t need that –
thank goodness.
We see here that the
point of sexual dimorphisms can be for reproductive
success or survival advantage. These are what keeps a species living generation
after generation. However, evolution has deemed reproductive success even more
important than individual life span. In pheasants, the females live much
longer, so the males have to make themselves stand out so that they will mate
as often as possible in their shorter lives. Therefore, they are colored much
more brightly.
Next week, sexual
dimorphism isn’t just an animal thing. There are genders in plants too.
Sometimes they different sexes have very different characteristics so that they
can mate as well, but do plants select mates?
For
more information or classroom activities, see:
Sexual
dimorphism –
sexual
selection –
No comments:
Post a Comment