To begin to answer this question, you first must decide what a language is. Linguists have four criteria for
sounds to be a language. One, each vocalization has a certain order – the short
"i" sound always precedes the "en" sound in the word “in.” Second, the must be
order between vocalizations – this is syntax. Three, the vocalizations can not be
tied to or defined by a specific emotional state – you can yell the word “Hey,” either to
let someone know to stop doing something, or to call out to a friend you
haven’t seen. And four, novel localizations are understood – you can say
something that has never been said before, but those people listening to you will understand
its meaning.
If sounds follow those four rules, then they are an oral language.
So humans have spoken language and other animals don't - although the majority of people don’t use it very
well. A discussion could be had as to whether whale
song is language, whether American Sign Language is true language, and whether
parrots can really talk.
But the question remains, why are humans so much better at
making sounds and language. We share 98% of our genes with chimpanzees, but
they can make only three dozen or so vocalizations. Humans can make hundreds of
different sounds – every noise required for every language on Earth. Where did
we separate from apes in terms of speaking?
Current hypotheses focus on two areas; brain molecular
biology and body anatomy. First
the anatomy – we can make more vocalizations because of how our throats and
chests have evolved.
To make
sounds, you must be able to expel air in a controlled manner, this
requires rib muscles and innervation to allow controlled exhalation – we got
it, apes don’t. The air that is expelled passes over the vocal folds and vibrates
them – this produces sound waves. The wave that is produced is based on the way
your muscles change the shape of the vocal fold cartilage, and one way to alter the
laryngeal muscle tone and shape is by moving your tongue.
The tongue is a muscle, and ours goes further back in our
throat as compared to that of apes. Theirs is housed completely within their mouth, but
ours is attached much deeper, and we can change the shape of our voice box by
using our tongue. You can stick out your tongue and move it side to side and
feel your Adam’s apple move.Your adam's apple is NOT the same thing as your hyoid bone; the adam's apple is the laryngeal prominence associated with your voice box, but you can see that moving your tongue can modulate the vocal folds.
The other characteristic of the tongue that makes a
difference is that it is our most sensitive touch appendage. We can make
small and discrete moves with the tongue, and sense where it is in relation to
our teeth and cheeks. This is another reason we can make so many different
sounds, and is also why babies put everything in their mouths.
Another
anatomical difference is that humans have a free-floating hyoid bone; it is the
only bone in the human body that is not anchored to another bone. By attaching
to the pharyngeal and tongue muscles, our hyoid helps us to make more sounds
than just hoots and grunts. While apes do have a hypoid bone, it is not located
as deep in their throat as is ours. In fact, humans infant larynx and hyoid
bone anatomy looks a lot like ape anatomy, but as we grow, our voice box and
hyoid bone descend in our throat, while those of the apes do not. This is one
reason it takes babies a while to learn to speak, muscle tone being another.
Your ribs muscles, your tongue attachment and your hyoid
bone are all good reasons why humans can make more vocalizations as compared to
no human animals, but our brains matter too. The shear size of our brain means
that we can devote more neurons to abstract thought, assigning meanings to
vocalizations – this is the basis of a large dynamic language. But there is a
molecular issue as well.
The fox2p protein is involved in vocalization and in
understanding language. In songbirds with a mutated fox2p, their song is
incomplete and inaccurate. In humans, defects in fox2p activity lead to severe
language impairments in both speaking and in understanding. Two small mutations in the human fox2p as compared to the animal version is much of separates our language ability from theirs.
The fox2p protein acts in just about every cell, so it does have other functions. A very recent study has looked at the role of foxp2 function in auditory learning. Proper speech is closely related to auditory cues, these cues educate motor processes that are used to form sounds. In the 2012 study, mice heterozygous for either of two fox2p mutations showed significant defects in learning the motor processes to mimic auditory cues.
In similar fashion, language disorders are a hallmark of some mental diseases. Another 2012 study sought to determine if fox2p changes were associated with schizophrenia. In a population of Chinese Han, a one individual change in fox2p (of 12 studied) was significantly associated with schizophrenic patients, but was not found in normal individuals. This single nucleotide polymorphism was rare, but was associated with both depression and schizophrenia. It is evident that normal fox2p function is necessary for speech as well as other cognitive functions. And having a normal fox2p means we are able to talk about fox2p amongst ourselves.
The fox2p protein acts in just about every cell, so it does have other functions. A very recent study has looked at the role of foxp2 function in auditory learning. Proper speech is closely related to auditory cues, these cues educate motor processes that are used to form sounds. In the 2012 study, mice heterozygous for either of two fox2p mutations showed significant defects in learning the motor processes to mimic auditory cues.
In similar fashion, language disorders are a hallmark of some mental diseases. Another 2012 study sought to determine if fox2p changes were associated with schizophrenia. In a population of Chinese Han, a one individual change in fox2p (of 12 studied) was significantly associated with schizophrenic patients, but was not found in normal individuals. This single nucleotide polymorphism was rare, but was associated with both depression and schizophrenia. It is evident that normal fox2p function is necessary for speech as well as other cognitive functions. And having a normal fox2p means we are able to talk about fox2p amongst ourselves.
Next week we will take a quick look at the speeds at which organisms can move - is distance per unit time the best way to measure this?
Kurt, S., Fisher, S., & Ehret, G. (2012). Foxp2 Mutations Impair Auditory-Motor Association Learning PLoS ONE, 7 (3) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033130
Li, T., Zeng, Z., Zhao, Q., Wang, T., Huang, K., Li, J., Li, Y., Liu, J., Wei, Z., Wang, Y., Feng, G., He, L., & Shi, Y. (2012). FoxP2 is significantly associated associated with schizophrenia and major depression in the Chinese Han Population World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 1-5 DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2011.615860
I know animals can talk, I saw Donkey talk in Shrek!
ReplyDeleteFYI, here is a post you might find interesting on science blogging. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/a-blog-around-the-clock/2012/07/10/science-blogs-definition-and-a-history/
John