Showing posts with label pathology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pathology. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Viva La Evolution

Biology concepts – evolution, reproductive advantage, natural selection, co-dominance, X-linked genes

Last week we learned how less aggressive strains of malaria were used to treat neurosyphilis and how they may be useful in treating HIV infection. This week, we will turn 180˚ and see if other diseases can help prevent or lessen the effects of malaria. In the process, much can be learned about natural selection and reproductive advantage.

Plasmodium-infected red blood cells develop knobs,
the surface protrusions seen on the left erythrocyte.
These knobs are covered in a certain protein that
inhibits the immune system’s ability to recognize this
cell as infected and respond to it. The cell on the right
is also infected with P. falciparum, but has a mutation
that prevents knob formation. Image credit: Ross
Waller and Alan Cowman.
As you undoubtedly remember from last week, malaria is a parasite-caused infectious disease that is transmitted from human to human by mosquitoes. The parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, takes up residence in the red blood cells (RBC) to reproduce. The red cells burst to release the organisms, and this brings fever and weakness.

As far back as the 15th and 16th centuries, quinine, made from the bark of the cinchona tree, was being used in Peru to treat malaria. Chloroquine, mefloquine, and quinine all work against malaria in similar fashion. Because of their neutral pH, they move across membranes easily including the lysosome membrane. Once inside the lysosome, they become charged and can’t get out. This includes the trophozoite-containing lysosomes. In the RBC, trophozoites consume hemoglobin to obtain amino acids, and the heme is digested in the lysosomes to form a black malaria pigment. The quinine drugs in the lysosome bind up the heme and produce a toxic product (cytotoxic heme) that kills the parasite.

There are other classes of drugs that are useful against P. falciparum. Primaquine and the artemisinin drug, artesunate, act by a completely different mechanism from that the quinine drugs. Artesunate is excellent for treating P. falciparum malaria, while primaquine is often used in conjunction with quinine to treat P. vivax or P. ovale forms of the disease.

These drugs work by breaking down – weird, but this is how many drugs work. It isn’t what you swallow that kills the organism, it's the metabolites (the products made by your biochemistry breaking down the drug) that are active. In the case of artesunate and primaquine, the heme molecule in the red blood cells releases peroxide from the parent compound (the drug you take). This is just like the peroxide you use to wipe out cut in order to prevent infection.

Artusenate comes from the sweet wormwood
plant. Chinese herbal medicine has used it for
thousands of years. A recipe for an Artemisia
based malaria medicine was found on a tablet
from the Han Dynasty (206 BCE to 20 CE). It is
now being investigated as a treatment for breast
cancer, also based on its ability to form radicals.
Oxygen is crucial for cellular function because it can gain electrons and can react with many other atoms. Unfortunately, this also makes it harmful to your cells as well. Without proper supervision, forms of oxygen that have picked up an extra electron or two (peroxide, superoxide, nitric oxide) can react with many important molecules in your cells and leave the cell impossibly damaged.

The cell has defenses against free radical damage, but higher than normal concentrations render the RBC fragile; on the tipping point of destruction. Treatment with primaquine or artesunate makes the cell inhospitable for the parasite, the red blood cells become flop houses instead of five star hotels. The parasite’s operating instructions are to survive and reproduce, but these drugs pull up the erythrocyte welcome mat and the parasite seeks moves on to seek friendlier accommodations.

Unfortunately, some strains of P. falciparum have become resistant to some quinine drugs, especially chloroquine. The free radical generating drugs are still useful, but scientists in Western Cambodia recently reported artesunate drug resistance there. The parasite has evolved – evolutionary pressure is everywhere. The actions of humans have put pressure on the organism to evolve; those parasites with mutations to resist the drugs have a reproductive advantage, and those mutations get passed on. We had better have something else on our plate to combat malaria – we're working on it, but nature has provided some help as well.

There are natural defenses against malaria. We have seen that a fragile red blood cell helps in preventing are lessening the disease course of malaria. What else might do that? This is where human genes come into play.

Sickle cell disease creates a very fragile RBC. The mutation is just a single DNA base change in the hemoglobin beta chain peptide, but the result is a hemoglobin molecule that becomes pointy and can tear the red blood cell apart, or can get stuck in small blood vessels and prevent good blood flow. Reduced blood flow starves the downstream tissues of oxygen.

You get one gene for hemoglobin beta chain from each parent. The disease comes when an individual receives mutated genes from both parents. But that doesn’t mean that sickle cell anemia is a recessive trait. If you have one copy of the mutated gene, then you will have sickling problems when oxygen concentrations are low, like during exercise or at high altitude.
Sickle cell disease or a sickle cell trait episode can result in red blood
cells clogging up vessels and organs. On the left is an absolutely
HUGE spleen from a sickle cell patient. On the right is a normal sized
spleen, about 20% the size of the injured spleen on the left. A normal 
spleen is about the size of your hand, maybe a little skinnier.

If sickle cell anemia was a recessive disease, then a single wild type (normal) gene would be dominant, and you would show no disease. Instead, sickle cell anemia is co-dominant, one mutated allele (copy of the gene) is like having half the disease; it only shows up in certain circumstances.

This can still be a pebble in your shoe, just ask Ryan Clark, the Pro-Bowl safety for the Pittsburgh Steelers. In a 2007 game in Denver (altitude 5300 ft, 1616 m), Ryan almost died from a sickling attack during the game, and ended up having his spleen and gall bladder removed (remember that sickled RBCs can clog blood vessels, especially in blood rich organs like the spleen).

When Pittsburgh next played Denver, Clark didn’t even make the trip. This just happened to be the 2011 playoff game in which Tim Tebow threw a long touchdown pass in overtime to the receiver being covered by Clark’s replacement. Sometimes disease can change how sports evolve as well.

Thalassemia is another example. This is a group of inherited disorders wherein there is reduced production of one of the subunits of hemoglobin (hemoglobin is made from 2 alpha and 2 beta subunits). Alpha-thalassemias have mutations in the alpha subunit; likewise for beta-thalassemia.

Reduced subunit number means reduced hemoglobin number; the blood won’t carry enough oxygen, and the patient is constantly oxygen-poor in his/her tissues. Having two mutated alpha genes is lethal in the very young (called hydrops fetalis), but you can live with one mutated alpha gene, one mutated beta gene, or even two mutated beta genes.

This the broad bean, or fava bean in opened pod
and out of the pod in a bowl. The ancient Greeks
used to vote with fava beans, a young white bean
meant yes, and old black one meant no.
Sickle cell trait (one mutated allele), and thalassemias result in fragile erythrocytes. This makes them poor hosts for malaria, and confer a resistance to the disease - bad genes aren’t bad in every case. And just for good measure here is another example.

Favism, better called glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDH), is an X-linked genetic disease; the gene is on the X chromosome. A female (XX) has two copies, so having one mutant copy is no problem, but a male (XY) has only one, so getting a mutated copy from your mother means that you ONLY have the mutated gene – this brings the disease.

The enzyme G6PDH works in several pathways; in your red blood cells, it is the only source of reduced glutathione, an important antioxidant. This means that things that trigger free radical formation in your red blood cells will trigger the disease – lots of weakness and lack of energy. If there is enough erythrocyte destruction, one could die.

Triggers include broad beans (fava beans), hence the name favism. Other triggers include many drugs, including primaquine and artesunate, the anti-malaria drugs that induce free radicals. Having G6PDH-deficiency is like having your own artesunate pharmacy right in your cells - you naturally have higher oxygen radical levels in your RBCs, so the malarial parasite can't live there.

Not by accident, sickle cell mutation is more prevalent in people of Sub-Saharan African descent, thalassemia mutation is more common in people from the warm, moist Mediterranean, and G6PDH-deficiency is found most commonly in the Mediterranean and Southeast Asia. These just happen to be the areas where malaria-carrying mosquitoes are most abundant. Evolutionary biologists make the argument that natural selection has maintained these genes in the populations because they provide a reproductive advantage to the species.

Left image: dark green is where there is thalassemia and yellow and red are where there is sickle cell. Right image, light green is where there is favism, and inside the light blue outline is duffy antigen mutation. It is
interesting that these areas are also where malaria is endemic.


You might die from sickle cell disease, but probably not from sickle cell trait or beta-thalassemia. Learning not to eat fava beans makes the G6PDH mutation less lethal. One might very well live to an age where one could mate and pass on his/her genes. The diseases might still kill the patient, just not as soon as malaria would.

Malaria is a killer, and significantly, a killer of the young. In East Africa, children are bitten by the anopheles mosquito on average 50-80 times each month. They very well might not reach an age to reproduce. Therefore, having sickle cell trait, thalassemia, or favism provides a reproductive advantage in these environments and natural selection has resulted in these alleles remaining in the populations in these areas.

The Duffy antigen (DARC) is important for P. vivax
entrance into the red blood cell. The Duffy binding
protein (DBP) interacts with DARC, the yellow parts
of the DBP are variable, and can be used to bind an
antibody. These variable areas overlap the binding
site, and can be used to make a vaccine for P. vivax.
Evolution maintains some diseases in order to combat others. It isn’t by design, it's by biology; no big plan is involved, as exemplified by the Duffy antigen. All your cells have proteins on their surfaces. One, called DARC (Duffy Antigen Receptor for Chemokines, or Duffy antigen) helps your cells receive signals from your immune system. In those people with a specific single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for Duffy Ag, the antigen is not present on red blood cells (though it is still present on all other cells).

Since P. vivax uses Duffy Ag as a way to enter the red blood cells, those with the Duffy SNP are resistant to P. vivax malaria – they don’t even have to suffer with some other disease; just a simple case of chance.  And the prepared mind exploits chance – the Duffy antigen binding protein is now a candidate for use as a P. vivax vaccine.

Next week, how the plague was defeated by a genetic disease.


Chootong P, Panichakul T, Permmongkol C, Barnes SJ, Udomsangpetch R, et al. (2012). Characterization of Inhibitory Anti-Duffy Binding Protein II Immunity: Approach to Plasmodium vivax Vaccine Development in Thailand. PLoS ONE , 7 (4) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035769

For more information or classroom activities, see:

Malaria –

sickle cell mutation –

thalassemia –

favism –

duffy antigen –

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Lucky For Me, I’m Diseased

Biology Concepts – disease, vaccination, single nucleotide polymorphisms

Jill Bolte Taylor is an Indiana University neuroscience
professor who suffered a massive stroke. She recognized
what was happening and has translated her thoughts
and feelings into a narrative to help us understand. She
is eloquent in describing how her stroke has affected her
in a positive way. --- Soon to be a major motion picture!

You rarely hear someone say how glad they are to be sick – unless a business meeting, unit test, or visit to the in-laws is involved. Robust health is a sign of good genes, and animals (including humans) instinctually seek out good genes when selecting mates. We don’t like to be sick, and we don’t want others (potential mates) to see us being sick.

True, there is that one person in a thousand who argues quite eloquently that an illness showed them another side of life, expanding their world-view and making them a better person. I applaud this attitude, but did you ever notice that it’s only the survivors that can gain this insight?

Our entire health care system is based on the idea that it is preferable to not be sick. The best way to bring this about is to reduce the chances that we will encounter anything that might provoke a response from our body, including pathogens (disease causing organisms, from pathos = disease and genique = to produce) and allergens (living or non-living molecules that can induce an allergic response).

But what does it mean to be “sick?” If you are infected by a pathogen, are you necessarily sick? There are infections that are subclinical or asymptomatic (without signs of disease), and there are carrier states, when a person is infected and can transmit the disease, but does not have symptoms. Are these people still sick?

You can be in a social situation where you feel empathy or regret, “I feel just sick about how I treated her.” Is this true sickness? Your mental state of mind is important in your health; if you talk yourself into being sick, are you really sick?

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are one base
changes in a gene sequence. “Polymorphism” means
that the population will show different sequences at this
point. SNPs may produce no change in the protein, but in
some cases they may change the shape or function of the
protein just slightly. This may not cause disease, but may
affect the course of a disease, or how drugs will work in
that individual. SNPs may one day lead to personalized
medicines in a new science called pharmacogenomics.
Drugs will be designed to work best for your particular
DNA sequence.

What about genetic mutations? Can everyone with a genetic mutation be considered sick? If yes, then we are all sick, because everyone one of us has thousands, perhaps millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (differences in a single base of DNA that might lead to change in function of a protein). I would suspect that most of us have larger mutations as well; the older we are, the more mutations we have. Some mutations render a person predisposed (more likely) to develop a disease – is this person sick even before he/she acquires the illness?

Osteoarthritis is a disease that can wear away joint surfaces and necessitate hip or knee replacement. My father has two artificial hips due to osteoarthritis, but does that make him sick or ill?

You see someone coughing, sneezing and blowing his/her nose. It could be due to respiratory allergies or a bacterial or viral infection. Are they sick in one instance, but not the other? I have seen TV ads that try to convince allergy sufferers that they are a menace to society, and should be embarrassed about their condition (unless they use their wonderful product). The entirety of the message in our society is that any illness or condition is a deficit.

To summarize our man-made rule: diseases are bad, and being exposed to diseases is bad, so keep your environment clean and antiseptic. Don’t get me wrong – I am not mocking the rule. I would rather not be sick - so much so that I am careful where I go and what I touch – in some places I simply choose not to breathe, just to be on the safe side. Disease prevention is an important part of life expectancy.

But are there exceptions? Is it sometimes good to get sick, either in general or with some specific disease? I think you know there must be exceptions, otherwise we would just be left with an interesting discussion of what it means to be sick. I bet you can even come up with at least example on your own. There are in fact boatloads of general and specific exceptions to this rule. Let’s take a few weeks and cover a few examples that are exceptions to "disease is bad" rule.

Our first exception is one that you may have already thought of – vaccines. With many vaccines, getting the disease is the key to not getting the disease – counterintuitive, isn’t it? I will use smallpox as an example of the idea that sickness prevents sickness, but there are many others.

Smallpox survivors had a very distinct look. It was
unfortunate that the lesions showed up most heavily on
the face and arms. Thankfully, the disease has been
eradicated, and the virus only exists now in two
laboratories, at the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta
and the “vector” lab in Siberia. Whether these stocks
should be destroyed is a matter of some debate.
Smallpox, until recently, had been a scourge on mankind for thousands of years. The infection is caused by a virus (Variola major or minor) and may present in several different forms. It was a very dangerous disease, the hemorrhagic form was almost universally lethal. Those that survived smallpox were marked for life (see picture).

In the 1790’s, Edward Jenner of Gloucestershire, England noticed that milk hands and milkmaids seemed to be immune (from Latin, immunis = exempt) to smallpox and he wondered why that might be. The milking workers told him they felt protected because they worked with diseased cows, those that had a mild disease called cowpox. For some reason, having had cowpox kept the milkmaids from catching smallpox.

It turns out that cowpox and smallpox are enough alike that having one will prevent you from having the other. It was on this basis that Jenner developed the first vaccine (Latin from vaccinus = from cows, coined by Louis Pasteur as a tribute to Jenner). By pricking the skin of a young boy with a needle contaminated with the pus from a young milkmaid with cowpox, Jenner showed that this could prevent infection with smallpox (Jenner wasn’t the first to vaccinate with cowpox, just the first to prove it prevented smallpox).

Contracting cowpox, a mild disease that did not kill or scar, could prevent one from catching smallpox, a terrible disease that often killed and left survivors with permanent reminders of their ordeal. Maybe getting sick ain’t always so bad. We will talk more next week about just how vaccination works to produce a protective immune response.

Cowpox vaccination is an example of using one disease to prevent another, but even 100 years before Jenner it was recognized that you could prevent smallpox by giving people smallpox. Strange, isn’t it? Variolation was performed by blowing ground smallpox scabs up the nose of another person, or by pricking them to place the material under the skin.

The virus in the olds scabs was definitely variola, it was just weakened (attenuated) by its age and its time outside of healthy cells. The virus was recognized by the body and an immune response is mounted, but the virus was too weak to produce a fulminant infection was eliminated by the body. But not before it helped the vicitim become immune to subsequent smallpox infection.

Poliomyelitis infection led to a paralysis of the muscles.
This could include the respiratory muscles, so iron lungs
were used to force air in and out of the patients’ lungs.
Before a vaccine was developed, a treatment was
developed by an unaccredited nurse from Australia.
Sister Elizabeth Kenny overcame much professional and
gender prejudice to show that heat and passive exercise
to retrain muscles was better than the then used
immobilization therapy. Try to see the biopic “Sister
Kenny” on TCM some time.

Attenuated vaccines do carry some risk. Paralytic poliomyelitis has almost been eradicated thanks to Jonas Salk’s inactivated (dead) vaccine injections and Sabin’s orallly taken, attenuated vaccine. The attenuated vaccine is better at preventing a natural infection, but in rare cases the vaccine virus can revert back to a wild form and result in iatrogenic (iatro = doctor and genique = to cause) polio, also called vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). Thankfully, widespread use of the Salk and Sabin vaccines in the 1950’s has made vaccination in the US (as of 2000) and UK (2004) unnecessary.

Many of the vaccines used today are engineered in a laboratory from just a portion of the organism. By using only the antigenic portion (that part that elicits an immune response) of the virus, there is no risk of iatrogenic disease. If the viral portion is produced in a laboratory using DNA technologies, it is called a recombinant vaccine. In some cases, the antigenic part of the virus is weak on its own, so these subunit vaccines may be conjugated (joined to) some other molecule that will elicit a stronger immune response.

Unfortunately, there is a growing number of people ignoring history and putting are their children and the population at large at risk. Some parents’ reluctance to vaccinate is based on a single 1998 study in which vaccination was linked to autism, even though the author of the paper, Andrew Wakefield, has been convicted of scientific fraud and banned from the practice of medicine. Wakefield was an investor in a company that was going to offer medical testing for vaccine-associated autism and as well as assist in autism/vaccine lawsuits, so he falsified his data in an effort to make his company profitable.  

As a result of the vaccine scare, the UK has seen a rise in the number of measles, mumps, and rubella cases in the last decade. These are diseases associated with childhood, but can cause severe disease or death in many victims, especially adults.

Pertussis, also called whooping cough, is transmitted only
from person to person. If no around you has it, you can’t
get it. However, symptoms may not show for 6 weeks after
infection, so everyone should be vaccinated. The coughing
can be so violent that it breaks blood vessels around the
eyes and nose – and it can kill young children.

Many in the US are also selecting to apply for vaccination exemption due to medical, religious, or personal beliefs; therefore, disease incidence is rising in America as well. In July, 2012, the CDC reported that the US had 18,000 cases of pertussis (whooping cough) in the past year, including an epidemic of more than 2500 cases in Washington state from January to June. This points out the need for vigilance in monitoring, as some of these patients had been vaccinated. This suggests that that the protection may not be lifelong; a booster vaccination may be necessary, although it is also telling that Washington state has one of the highest vaccination exemption rates in the country.

This also brings up the idea of herd immunity. There are some people who have been vaccinated, but protection is not complete. The elderly may not be able to react completely even if vaccinated, as might the very young. Some vaccinations may not take - how many time have you had an antibody titer test to make sure your vaccine worked? It is very rare to get titers unless something is suspected and you are already sick. Therefore, many people must count on the vaccination of the herd - a critical percentage of population needs to be protected in order to keep the incidence of the disease below a crucial level. If the level rises - as with too many people choosing not to vaccinate - then the incidence will sky rocket because it will affect those people who don't happen to know they are not protected. Un vaccinated people affect everyone, not just themselves.

Next week we will look at vaccine driven immune responses in a bit more depth, in an effort to understand why we have to get a flu vaccination every year.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2012). Pertussis epidemic - washington, 2012. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 61, 517-22 PMID: 22810264

For more information on these subjects, or classroom activities, see:

Sick/diseased/ill:

Single nucleotide polymorphisms and pharmacogenomics:

Vaccines:

Lack of vaccination:

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Blood --- Not Just For Vampires Anymore


“Nosferatu” was the first film (1922, directed by F.W. Murnau)
made about the blood sucking undead. It followed the Stoker
novel so closely that his estate sued and a court ordered all the
copies destroyed. Only five survived, and were used to restore
the film in 1994. One area where did deviate from the novel
was in the way the vampire dies. Murnau introduced the idea
of sun sensitivity, which caught on and was accepted as part
of the myth.
It may not be surprising, but there’s a lot of pathology in Halloween. Since the holiday is coming up soon, let's take a look at some of the gory details.

Pathology (pathos = disease, and ology = study of) is the study of disease, and being dead is the worst disease - O.K., maybe being undead is worse. Between life and death is where the vampires live, so maybe this is a good place to start.

One prerequisite for being a vampire is that you have a taste for blood, but if that was the only rule, then almost everyone would be a vampire. Hematophagy (hemo = blood, and phagy = eat) is as common as bad Dracula impressions. Almost every culture consumes blood.

Many people eat cooked blood. The Poles eat blood soup (czernina), and the Brits love their blood pudding as much as the Chinese gobble their fried blood tofu. The next time you go to a French restaurant for the coq au vin, remember that the sauce is made with rooster blood!

There are also those cultures that drink blood. The inuit peoples drink fresh seal blood, and the Maasi in Africa rely on a mixture of cow’s milk and cow’s blood as a staple of their diet. And why not, blood is a decent source of nutrition.

Blood has a lot of protein and is a good source of lipids. Of course it is iron rich, and is a source of fluid and salt if you happen to be caught in the desert. If a vampire happens to pick out an uncontrolled diabetic, a drink of blood could also be a good source of carbohydrates.

These are Finnish blood pancakes. You have to wonder about 
a recipe whose first ingredient is 40 ml of blood. But 
the lingonberry jam on top is a nice touch; you would 
hardly remember that you are eating blood.
Many animals practice hematophagy. Female mosquitoes consume blood; both sexes of the Cimicidae family (bed bugs) survive solely on blood, as do arachnids of the Ixodida order (ticks). Some of the 700 species of leeches feed on blood only, but most eat small invertebrates as well. There is even a vampire finch on the Galapagos Islands that bites the rumps of other birds and licks off the blood. And then there are the vampire bats.

As members of the Chiroptera order (chira = hand, and ptera = wing), vampire bats are members of a grand biologic exception. Bats are the only mammals that truly fly. True flying requires lift, being able to sustain a rise in altitude by mechanical means. Closest to this is soaring, which is the use of upwelling air currents to gain altitude. But gliding is the most common type of aerial motion in reptiles, amphibians, mammals. Gliding is really controlled falling; it means moving at less than a 45˚ angle to the ground.

Bats are so finely evolved for flying that they have lost most of their ability to walk, but vampire bats are an exception even in the world of bats. They often approach their victims by walking or running up to them from behind. Vampire bats were quite the biologic discovery.

The vampire bat wasn’t named as such until 1774, but vampire legends (4000 BCE) and the word vampire (circa 1734) had been around much longer. Therefore, the bat was named after the undead, blood-drinking person, not the other way around.

Three species of bat, ranging from Mexico to Chile, subsist exclusively on blood. Each has evolved tricks to help them secure the blood they need. Their noses house special thermoreceptors to help them find areas of flesh where blood vessels lay close to the surface. The way their brain perceives and interprets this information (see this post) is very similar to the way pit viper snakes sense live prey (see this post).

Common vampire bats like to bite and lick blood from around 
the hooves of cattle and such. They are so sneaky, they run 
up to the animals from behind instead of flying. Their wings 
are stronger than most bats, so they can help support their 
body weight when they run or hop.
Two species (Diphylla ecaudata, Diaemus youngi) feed on the blood of birds, while the other (Desmodus rotundus, a.k.a. common vampire bat) feeds on mammals, including humans, but they all feed exclusively at night. This may have helped to link the bats to the monsters, as vampires are supposedly harmed by sunlight.

The common vampire bat will shave away the hair away with its teeth and then plunges its incisors in about 7-8 mm to bring blood, as its incisors are conical and are designed for cutting. Vampire bats are an exception in that they are the only bat species that do not have enamel on their incisors.

Enamel is very strong in compression and wear, but is brittle and rounds off the points of the teeth. Vampire bats need very sharp incisors, so they have forgone the enamel. Broken enamel would blunt their teeth, a lethal problem for a bloodsucker (although they don't suck).

The Swiss Federal Institute for Technology at Lausanne has
developed a drone that can walk and fly, based on the movement
of the vampire bat. When it goes terrestrial, it pulls in the the
middle section of wing and the rotates the wing tips
to propel itself (2015).
Importantly, vampire bat salvia contains anticoagulants to keep the blood flowing and vessel relaxants to keep the local blood vessels from constricting.  A new study has shown that bat saliva may have potential in human medicine. The common vampire bat is the source of a new clot-dissolving compound called desmoteplase; it activates an enzyme called plasminogen, which breaks down early clot formation.

Desmoteplase is structurally similar to a currently used clot buster called tPA (tissue plasminogen activator), but has some differences that make it more selective for fibrin. Importantly, it doesn’t cause nearly as much neuronal apoptosis or breakdown of the blood-brain barrier as does tPA. Desmoteplase is in phase III clinical trials for use in ischemic stroke patients (a brain blood vessel is blocked by clot). I wonder if human vampires have such useful saliva.

Ischemic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in the brain
is occluded so oxygen rich blood can’t reach the brain
tissue beyond the occlusion. The middle cerebral artery is
a common site for these cerebrovascular accidents. 
Desmoteplase appears to be effective against occlusions
caused by blood clots, but there can be other occlusions,
name scar tissue from infection or atherosclerotic plaques.
Vampire bats usually slice open a small vessel with their incisors, and then lick the 20-25 ml of blood that flows out. This is very different from the idea of vampires sucking out all the blood from a human; something not consistent with long life. But could losing blood ever be considered a good thing? You know there has to be an exception.

In certain diseases, removing excess blood is beneficial. We talked earlier about excess iron in hereditary hemochromatosis, for which bloodletting is an appropriate treatment, but there are others.  Polycythemia vera is a genetic disease in which too many red blood cells are produced, leading to high blood volume and pressure, excess bleeding and clotting. To bring the volume closer to normal, a pint of blood may be removed once a week.

Finally, in chronic hepatitis C infection there is damage to the liver, a major storehouse of iron. This releases iron into the blood, and causes a secondary hemochromatosis. Small amounts of blood can be removed to help lessen the iron overload. Maybe old-timey medicine didn’t have everything wrong.

These same old cultures had myths about the undead that would feed on human flesh, but our current vampire myths date from early 1700’s Southern Europe. There are diseases that could be mistaken for some or all of the aspects of vampirism, but are they the chicken or the egg? In many cases, myths and folklore have some basis in fact, but in these cases hindsight is hardly ever 20/20.

Tuberculosis and rabies have a few aspects that are similar to the common tales of vampires. TB leaves its victims emaciated; they end up pale with swollen eyes that make them sensitive to light. They might cough up blood, and the first victim often gave the disease to other members of the house, so it have might appeared that the first was draining the others.

Similarly, people with rabies may exhibit a bloody froth from the mouth because lesions on the throat make it very painful to swallow. They may also be driven to bite people due to the encephalitis (encephalo = brain, and itis = inflammation) that the rabies virus causes. Other behaviors associated with rabies are sleeplessness (night time activity) and fear of looking at one’s own reflection.

Rabies spreads through the nerves, and the brain is the main
organ affected by the infection. Without vaccination or
treatment rabies is 100% fatal. Animals with the infection lose
fear of man, and become very aggressive, and then so do people
who contract the virus. Two cases of human bit rabies have been
confirmed (both in Ethiopia in the 1990’s).
Vampire bats are carriers of rabies, and this may contribute to their use in vampire lore, but recent evidence says bat rabies may not be such a bad thing. A 2012 CDC study shows that many Peruvian natives have a natural immunity to rabies, a disease that kills 55,000 people each year. The vampire bat maybe helping drive this immunity. It’s bite can deliver a sub-pathogenic dose of virus, enough to convey immunity, but not enough to cause disease. A case of vaccination by bite!

Another disease that mimics some vampire characteristics is xeroderma pigmentosum (XP). XP leads to an extreme sensitivity of the skin to the radiation of the sun. XP was first described in the scientific literature in 1874, just a couple of years before the first tales of sun sensitivity in vampires. There are several different types of XP, but all are autosomal recessive genetic diseases. Most involve mutation and inactivation of nuclear excision repair enzymes.

Sunlight contains UV radiation that causes DNA mutation. Excision repair enzymes usually fix the DNA damage. Without them, afflicted individuals manifest hundreds of skin cancers, and acquire others that are lethal (malignant melanoma). The patients’ eyes are very sensitive to light; they sunburn almost instantly, and must be kept out of sunlight. The children from the 2001 film, “The Others” had XP (while they were alive).

Congenital Erythropoietic Porphyria (CEP) is by far the disease most often associated with vampirism. Exceedingly rare, this autosomal recessive genetic disease has only been diagnosed in about 200 people, but there are many variants of porphyria that carry some or most of the same symptomology as CEP.

Porphyria can lead to deposits of porhyrins in the enamel
of developing teeth. The word porphyrin comes from the
Greek word for purple, so the discoloration is often darker
than what is shown here. Interestingly, tetracycline use in
pregnant women and children can lead to a similar
deposition, but for very different reasons.
The mutation common to the porphyrias is in the gene for an enzyme called uroporphyrinogen cosynthetase. Involved in heme synthesis, the loss of this enzyme leads to the buildup of heme intermediates called porphyrins. The porphyrins accumulate in the skin and organs and act as a sun-activated toxin.

The symptoms of the porphyrias do make you think of vampires: sun sensitivity with extreme burning, white skin, bloodshot eyes, sensitive eyes, anemia (low number and therefore a need for red blood cells), reddish tears, reddish urine, red pigment in the enamel of the teeth (erythrodontia).

The red teeth really bring to mind feeding on flesh or blood, and porphyrias also bring increased body and facial hair (hirsutism), so they may contribute to the werewolf legend as well. This is interesting because Medieval Europeans would burn the corpses of people who were thought to be werewolves, so as to prevent them from returning as vampires - better safe than sorry! 

Next week we will continue our look at Halloween by investigating death – how likely is that you might be buried alive?

For more information or classroom activities, see:

Hematophagy –

Vampire bats –

Xeroderma pigmentosum –

Congenital Erythropoietic Porphyria –
 



Medcalf RL (2012). Desmoteplase: discovery, insights and opportunities for ischaemic stroke. Br J Pharmacol. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01514.x

Amy T. Gilbert, Brett W. Petersen, Sergio Recuenco, Michael Niezgoda, Jorge Gómez, V. Alberto Laguna-Torres and Charles Rupprecht (2012). Evidence of Rabies Virus Exposure among Humans in the Peruvian Amazon Am J Trop Med Hyg DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0689