Showing posts with label axoneme. Show all posts
Showing posts with label axoneme. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Evolving A Second Job


Biology concepts – protein moonlighting, undulipodia, evolution, basal body, centriole, GAPDH, intraflagellar transport


Today’s post is on a multitasking cell structure. This
would make Alton Brown proud, since he hates tools
that do only one thing. The University of Miami of
Florida football team runs through fire extinguisher
blasts when they enter the stadium – maybe Alton
can find a second use for his.
Alton Brown from Food Network hates a unitasker. He wants all his kitchen tools to have more than one function – I least I think it’s just his kitchen tools. But he might just as well be talking about biology. Nature hates a unitasker, that’s why some many things in our cells have multiple jobs.

This phenomenon is called protein moonlighting. The re-evaluation of the human genome (about 19,000 genes) suggests that many proteins have more than one distinct function. This would allow for a relatively small number of genes to provide a large functional proteome (the total number of protein functions).  As such, a 2014 study is showing the importance of moonlighting proteins in health and biology.

There are rules for a protein to have a legitimate second job. It’s only moonlighting if the two functions are unrelated,  the functions can't be carried out by two different domains of the protein either. This would suggest a gene fusion event. The two functions must be independent, so ablating one doesn’t affect the other.

There are hundreds of examples of moonlighting proteins in the literature now, and more are sure to follow. There are examples aplenty within the glycolysis pathway; you know, the breakdown of sugar for energy. No fewer than seven of the ten glycolytic enzymes are known to have other jobs.


Crystallin proteins (alpha and beta) make up the
majority of the lens and cornea of the eye. They are
transparent, but they do more than that. Recent
studies show that they have enzymatic activity in other
tissues. Aldehyde dehydrogenase and transketolase are
enzymes that turn out to be moonlight crystallins.
The king of the moonlighting proteins is glyceraldehyde -3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Sure, it's one of the enzymes that breaks glucose down to pyruvate, but it does so much more – like helping to maintain the ends of our chromosomes (telomeres), working to move tRNAs out of the nucleus, controlling the expression of some genes, especially those involved with gamma-interferon, repairing our DNA when it is damaged. And apparently GAPDH is crucial for helping cells to bring in particles from outside (endocytosis). That’s a full day.

But as amazing as GAPDH is, today’s example of a multitasker is even more rare, in that the moonlighter is a complete structure, made of many proteins, and has two distinctly different jobs. What’s more, each function has its own exceptions. What's our structure of interest? The basal body, or perhaps I should call it the centriole.

Let’s talk about the basal body first. This is the base of the eukaryotic undulipodia (cilia and flagella). These moving tails come in two parts; the basal body and the axoneme. We talked at length about the axoneme a few months ago, with its nine doublet microtubules surrounding two singlet microtubules (9[2]+2, see picture below). Undulipodia movement, as opposed to the motor driven prokaryotic flagella, is achieved by sliding the different doublets forward and back past one another.

But in those previous posts we didn’t talk much about the basal body. It too is a ring of microtubules, although these are shorter polymers that in the axoneme. Instead of doublets, there are almost always nine sets of triplet microtubules, and there are no center microtubules (9[3]+0). Of course, there were a couple of exceptions, and we talked about them.


The basal body has a 9(3) + 0 structure, while the
axoneme is 9(2) + 0. While this cartoon shows the
complexity of the axoneme, our post today highlights
the complexity of the basal body. One thing this cartoon
does show, the axoneme is sheathed in the plasma
membrane, it isn’t a protein structure sticking out through
the membrane.
The basal body is about 100 nm wide and 150 nm long, and serves as the base of the flagellum or cilium. If a cell has hundreds of cilia, like the male gametes of the cycads we talked about last week, then it has hundreds of basal bodies as well – one per cilium.

The basal body serves as the nucleation site for mictrotubule growth into the axoneme. It’s like a skyscraper, the microtubule girders are built vertically on the basal body foundation; only here, the basal body sparks a self-assembly of the microtubules. You don’t need fearless guys climbing the beams to build an axoneme.

If we turn our attention to the centriole, we find that it’s used in mitosis. When a cell divides, each progeny cell receives one centrosome. Don’t confuse the centrosome with a centriole or a centromere (a near center point of a chromosome, it holds the two chromatids together). The centrosome is more of an area, it contains two centrioles, a mother and a daughter, and the pericentriolar matrix (PCM) amorphous group of proteins that help the centrioles do their job.

Each centriole is a complex microtubule formation in a 9(3)+0 arrangement, about 120 nm wide and 175 nm long. This is exactly the structure of the basal body – they’re the same thing! Well, almost.... a centriole has to mature into a basal body.

During S phase of the cell cycle (when the chromosome are replicated) the centrosome will duplicate. Each centriole grows another one from its side, at a right angle. The mother is a mother again, and the daughter becomes a mother for the first time. The two mother/daughter pairs then gather their own PCMs and move to the sides of the nucleus. When mitosis time comes, microtubules grow toward the chromsosomes, but from the mother centriole only. This is the spindle and will help pull the chromatids apart during cell division.


Start at the top left. During the cycle, a pair of centrioles
will separate and each will grow another from the proximal
end. The daughter centrioles then have to mature, with
proteins added toward the distal end. During mitosis, they
two pairs separate and form the spindle body, which pulls
the chromatids apart.
If you remove the centrioles after S phase, most cells can still go through mitosis just fine. In fact, there many cell types that don’t have centrioles at all (higher plants, some protists, most fungi). Even in cells that are supposed to have centrosomes, destroying centrioles with a laser after S phase doesn’t always affect mitosis negatively.

A commentary published in 2010 talks about how many cell types, including some oocytes can undergo meiosis without centrioles, while centriole numbers than are re-established after fertilization. However, in other tissues, loss of centrioles leads to genetic instability over time, even if the spindle will develop without the centrosome. To this point, we still haven’t resolved the issue of whether centrioles are necessary for proper cell division.

In the vast majority of cases, centrioles come from centrioles. One serves as a template to form the second. The process through which this occurs has just begun to be revealed in the past few years. There is a linking fiber from the proximal end of the mother centriole that acts as a seed point to start aggregation of the daughter centriole at a 90˚ angle to the first. 

The process is very complicated, but is carried out spontaneously, without specific gene products to guide it. It was first believed that if centrioles were lost, then they could not be regained. Of course, they also thought that centrioles had their own DNA. Now we know that in cases where centrioles are lost, they can form de novo, and function just fine in mitosis or as basal bodies. In several studies, removal of centrioles or cells without centrioles to begin with allows for new centrioles being formed from aggregated microtubules.


Intraflagellar transport is the method by which the
axoneme grows, adding tubulin monomers to the end.
The proteins are carried up the axoneme by walking
proteins. These are important not for just cilia assembly,
but also for cell signaling and sensing that occurs in
the undulipodia.
After centriole duplication by prescribed pathways, the basal body matures. A 2011 review shows that there are many proteins involved in the process. First the distal end of the centriole is capped, then it migrates to the cell membrane and docks. A transition zone is produced that allows for selective movement of molecules up and down the inside of the axoneme (intraflagellar transport, IFT).

Finally, there is attachment of accessory bodies like rootlets to anchor it to the membrane, transition fibers to move to the axoneme and distal appendages. Only after all this maturation of the basal body can the axoneme be built by IFT. This is how the process happens in all species EXCEPT fruit fly male gametes and the microbe Plasmodium yoelii, where the axoneme grows BEFORE plasma membrane docking of the basal body. 

What’s more, you can always reverse it and go from basal body back to centriole, so their functions must somewhat overlap. The basal body and centriole both serve as microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs). So what makes it a moonlighting structure?


Prokaryotic flagella just whip around in a circle, but
eukaryotic undulipodia have more of a beating motion.
The side view shows how the flow is one direction, while
the top view indicates that the motion is circular, but not
like a propeller.
The basal body does a different job by controling the direction of movement of the cilium or flagellum! The prokaryotic flagellar motor spins the prokaryotic flagella as we have described, but eukaryotic cilia or flagella beat, rather than flop around, and the direction in which they beat is important. Cilia on a cell beat in concert in one direction, and the basal body is asymmetrical enough to drive this directional beating. Believe it or not, this is controlled by a protein called disheveled.

That’s a little weird, but what’s really weird is the kids. In a 1991 paper, part of the oviduct of a quail was reversed, so that the cilia beat toward the ovary instead of toward the uterus. When cells divided through embryo and chick development, the cilia of the progeny cells had the same orientation as those in the parent! They continued to beat in the wrong direction. Since basal bodies are duplicated from basal bodies, the mother basal bodies gave rise to daughters that beat the same direction.

The evidence presented shows that we have an ancient, yet complex, structure that has a couple of important jobs. The question for evolutionary biologists is which came first, the basal body or the centriole? The last common eukaryotic ancestor (LECA), the cell from which all eukaryotic cells descend, had undulipodia, so the basal body is an extremely old structure. But all eukaryotic cells undergo mitosis or meiosis, so the centriole must be important too.

Notice the cilia that are the upper most in the animation.
They show best the coordinated beating that pushes fluid
in one direction.

Cells without either centrioles and basal bodies suggest that basal body function came first; since you can’t have undulipodia without basal bodies, but our discussion above shows you can have mitosis without centrioles.

On the other hand, centrioles have to mature to become basal bodies, wouldn’t this suggest that they came first? Or perhaps the basal body was the primary product and nature managed to find a use for one if its precursors. What do you think, is the basal body the chicken or the egg?

Next week let’s look at one of the animal kingdoms great exceptions in terms of cilia, even though primitive and higher animals have them, round worms don’t cilia or flagella!



Henderson, B., & Martin, A. (2014). Protein moonlighting: a new factor in biology and medicine Biochemical Society Transactions, 42 (6), 1671-1678 DOI: 10.1042/BST20140273

Kobayashi, T., & Dynlacht, B. (2011). Regulating the transition from centriole to basal body The Journal of Cell Biology, 193 (3), 435-444 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201101005

Debec, A., Sullivan, W., & Bettencourt-Dias, M. (2010). Centrioles: active players or passengers during mitosis? Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 67 (13), 2173-2194 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-010-0323-9

Boisvieux-Ulrich E, & Sandoz D (1991). Determination of ciliary polarity precedes differentiation in the epithelial cells of quail oviduct. Biology of the cell / under the auspices of the European Cell Biology Organization, 72 (1-2), 3-14 PMID: 1756309



For more information or classroom activities, see:

Protein moonlighting –

Centriole –

Basal body –

Centrosome –




Wednesday, October 8, 2014

A Tale Of Two Tails

Biology concepts – flagella, bacteria, prokaryotes, eukaryotes, undulipodia, axoneme, basal body, centriole


Everyone has the dream where you show up for a class
that you didn’t know was on your schedule, only to be
having a test. But in second place is the dream where you
are back in elementary school, or maybe the principal’s
office. Above is a picture of every teacher I had in
elementary school.
You find yourself transported back to sixth grade grammar class. You barely fit in the desk and your clothes are out of style.... again. You don’t know how you got there, but the immediate problem is that Mrs. Belcher has just called your name to answer the next question. What are homonyms?! You stare back at her with terror in your eyes.

But your study of word roots may help you survive. Homo- means same, while -nym means word. OK, it’s coming back to you. Homonyms can be words that are spelled but have different meanings and origins (called homographs) or words that are pronounced the same but have different spellings and meanings (called homophones).  Yes! The class cheers, and Mrs. Belcher is more than mildly surprised. Crisis averted.

I have no idea how you got transported back to grammar school, but your question and answer is very timely to our discussion today. Homographs, like minute (min-it, a short time) and minute (my-noot, a small amount), look the same, but have different meanings. Homophones, like to, too, and two sound the same but mean different things and have different origins.  This is very much like the differences in prokaryotic flagella and eukaryotic undulipodia. Too much of a stretch for you... maybe.

We have seen that bacterial flagella are long, whip-like structures protruding from the cell that can aid in motility. So are eukaryotic undulipodia. They look very similar, yet we are going to see they have very different structures, mechanisms of function, and origins – just like homophone and homonyms.  So maybe the analogy wasn’t so far off.

Both flagella and undulipodia extend from the cell surface with a long tail. But in the prokaryote, this was made of small subunits of flagellin proteins. In the undulipodia, the structure is called the axoneme, and is made of long microtubules of tubulin protein. Already we have significant differences between two things that look very similar.


A cross section of an undulipodium axoneme looks like
this – although I’m not sure they’re color coded in the
cell. Notice how the inner are connects the nested tubule
of one doublet to the outside tubule of the next doublet.
The inner arms are responsible for the degree of bend,
the outer arms are involved in the rate of movement. There
are other proteins involved, but we aren’t getting that
detailed. Maybe you want to do that on your own.
The axoneme (axo = axis, and neme = thread) of the undulipodia has a very distinct structure which is best appreciated when you look at it in cross section. The long microtubles appear as small circles in the cross cut, but they are arranged very precisely (see picture). They come in doublets, and there are nine sets of them surrounding a central doublet (called 9 + 2 or 9(2) + 2). This is very different from the single hollow tube of the prokaryotic flagellum.

The way the axoneme is built is also the key to how it works. The different microtubule doublets are cross-linked by protein complexes called dynein arms. There are inner arms and outer arms. An inner arm connects one microtubule from one doublet to another microtubule of the adjacent doublet. When one doublet slides further out from the cell body and the connected adjacent doublet doesn’t, this creates stress and the whole thing must bend to maintain the connections.

So, walking proteins are how the undulipodia create their whip-like action. There is a walking system analogous to dynein arm movement that has developed in many animals. We have looked at muscle contraction before. Just like myosin heads walking along actin filaments that are anchored to the muscle cell membrane, the dynein arms on some doublets start to crawl up or down the adjacent microtubule of an undulipodia creating a bend and then they can reverse to whip back the other direction. This is very different from the spinning motor of the bacterial flagellum.


Pay attention to these cartoons, they show how the undulipodia
bend. ATP powers the sliding of the dynein arms. As they move
down one tubule, that filament moves up. If the filaments are
anchored in the membrane, as they are in undulipodia, the
movement creates tension and a bend. The cartoon on the
right is a good summary.
The motions the two different mechanisms produce is different too (a homophone). While the prokaryotic flagellum spins like a propeller, the sliding of the microtubules makes the undulipodium wave back and forth, like a field of wheat on a breezy day, or how a snake might thrash if you held his head down (don’t just hold his tail down, he’ll bite you).

The undulipodium motion often occurs in just one plane, back and forth instead of all around, but that doesn’t mean it has too limit itself to that. It can spin too; it just takes a very coordinated sliding back and forth of microtubules.

Another difference between prokaryotic flagella and eukaryotic undulipodia is in how they are powered. We saw that flagella in bacteria get their force from the spinning motor, and the motor gets its energy from an ion gradient across the membrane. But in eukaryotes, it was seen early on that if you strip the membrane off of an undulipodium, and added ATP, they start to move.

Yes, all undulipodia are held within the membrane. Some bacterial flagella are membrane covered, but all eukaryotic versions are sheathed in plasma membrane. But back to the ATP. Exposing the naked undulipodium to ATP, even on a dead cell, can initiate the dynein walking and microtubule sliding, so it is definitely ATP powered.

Also, this points out that the power for the bacteria movement comes from the motor in the base, but the eukaryotic movement is in the axoneme, not the base. The basal body that anchors the eukaryotic undulipodium into the cell membrane is amazing in its own way. The basal body is actually a centriole, the same structure that helps to move the chromosomes apart in the spindle apparatus during mitosis. We’ll come back to this double duty organelle in a a few weeks.


Chlamydomonas algae species have a double flagella
for swimming. A single stroke as shown above. The
power strokes on top is followed by the recovery stroke
below. Put all the numbers together and looks like
someone swimming underwater. The picture of the
organism is there because it’s always better to see the
real thing as compared to a cartoon.
Our two systems still look similar, but we see how they are not so similar in structure and action. Since eukaryotic cells are so much bigger than prokaryotes, the first flagella to be examined and found to have the 9(2) + 2 structure were in sperm tails.

But soon after that, the protozoans were discovered to have undulipodia as well. Organisms from the algae genus Chlamydomonas have two long undulipodia that they use for motility. Located at the front of the cell, their movement pulls the alga through the water. But protozoans are just as likely to have undulipodia that push them through water. They can work both ways.

Amazingly, when a Chlamydomonas finds itself out of water, the undulipodia resorb in short order. Nature hates to waste energy, so why maintain a boat motor if you’re not in the water. But place them back in a liquid environment and the two structures will reassemble with in an hour – with the same structure 9(2) + 2 and working the same exact way.

Of course, saying they all have the same 9(2) + 2 structure is an invitation to find exceptions, and science has found them. A 2006 study found that rabbits are quite the rule breakers. Sure, they have 9(2) + 2 axonemes, but they don’t stop there. Some rabbit embryo undulipodia show a 9(2) + 0 structure, where the central doublet is completely missing, yet the structure functions just as other motile undulipodia.

What’s more, rabbits can also have 9(2) + 4 axonemes, with double the number of central microtubules. Again, they function just fine. Is there a reason for these variations – maybe, but maybe they are just mutations that didn’t have a negative impact, so they were retained.


You know how annoying it is when you touch a cactus
and those little bristles get stuck in your skin? Well,
don’t touch a bristleworm. They’re lined with those painful
bristles – hence the name. Somebody studied these worms,
and found out they have parasitic protozoans in their gut.
Then someone studied those parasites and found that they
have sperm. And someone studied the sperm and found
that they have unique axoneme structures. I love science.
A couple of parasitic protozoans that live in bristle worm guts show differences in their axonemes. Lecudina tuzetae sperm tails have a 6(2) + 0 structure, while the Diplauxis hatti protozoan sperm has a 3(2) + 0 axoneme. Described in a 1980 paper, this is the simplest motile undulipodium known – as of now.

The undulipodium basal body (born as a centriole) can have exceptions as well. The vast majority have a structure of 9(3) + 0, where instead of doublets, they have triplets. This makes sense since they need to be strong to support the axoneme.

But diatoms, very small algae cells protected by a silica shell, can have sperm that look very different, according to a 2013 study. Their basal bodies have been observed to have doublet microtubules, and are very similar to the axoneme. Even weirder, a couple of insects feel the need to go big with their basal bodies. Acerentomonon microrhinus, a primitive hexapod insect has sperm tail basal bodies with 14 microtubule doublets, while Sciara coprophila, a fungus gnat (see picture), has up to 90 singlet microtubules in its sperm basal body.

We have talked a lot about sperm tails and protozoan motility structures, and these undulipodia look the most like bacterial flagella. But undulipodia come in a couple of flavors; those longer than 40 m or so are called flagella while the shorter ones are called cilia. See the naming problem and why Lynn Margulis came up with undulipodia?


This is a fungus gnat – it sounds like they eat fungus,
but nope. Only the larval form feeds; the adults never
eat. That’s OK, they don’t live very long at all. They
overwinter in their adult form because they are unique
in that they can both tolerate freezing weather and freeze
themselves without damage. It must be important, since
their sperm tails are loaded with 90 microtubules in the
basal body – everyone knows that massive numbers of
microtubules is the best way to avoid cold damage.
Both eukaryotic flagella and cilia have the microtubule and dynein arm structure, with centrioles for their basal bodies. There are exceptions to the cilia that we will look at in a few weeks, but the biggest difference between them, besides their length, is that cilia occur in groups, while flagella are usually found in ones or twos. You could say that cilia and flagella are like synonyms, they have almost the same meaning (and structure), although they are two different things.

Next week – Halloween is coming, so what better time to have a discussion of genetically modified foods and an 19th century teenage girl who wrote the best science fiction book ever.




Prensier, G., Vivier, E., Goldstein, S., & Schrevel, J. (1980). Motile flagellum with a "3 + 0" ultrastructure Science, 207 (4438), 1493-1494 DOI: 10.1126/science.7189065

Idei, M., Osada, K., Sato, S., Nakayama, T., Nagumo, T., & Mann, D. (2012). Sperm ultrastructure in the diatoms Melosira and Thalassiosira and the significance of the 9 + 0 configuration Protoplasma, 250 (4), 833-850 DOI: 10.1007/s00709-012-0465-8

Feistel K, & Blum M (2006). Three types of cilia including a novel 9+4 axoneme on the notochordal plate of the rabbit embryo. Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 235 (12), 3348-58 PMID: 17061268




For more information or classroom activities, see:

Undulipodia –