Showing posts with label phylum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label phylum. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Almost This Or Almost That? Must Be The Other


Biology concepts – Protista, taxonomy, phylum, kingdom, monophyletic, paraphyletic, cladistics, algae, diatom, dinoflagellate


Euglena gracilis is an organism in the Kingdom Protista. It has
one long flagellar undulipodium, but it can also move by
amoeboid movement. It has chloroplasts and can do
photosynthesis, but it also can eat other organisms. Is it any
wonder that classifying protists is so hard?
Classifying living organisms is self-perpetuating job. Imagine if the dentist sold candy in his/her office, “Here’s your root canal and your Laffy Taffy.” Scientists try their best, but whenever you start sorting things out, you always have that pile left over that doesn’t seem to fit anywhere. So you have to rethink your categories and try again.

The best example of the inanity of classification is Kingdom Protista. The word means, “the very first,” probably because it is supposed that these were the first eukaryotes. How do we define the organisms of this Kingdom? The best we can manage is to say that they are the eukaryotes that aren't animals, plants, or fungi. Really, is that the best we can do?

In a perfect system, all the organisms of one kingdom would be descended from a single common ancestor (be monophyletic, mono = one, and phulon = tribe). But it don’t work like that. And this is where Kingdom Protista serves as a good example.

There are protists that look a lot like animals, those that resemble plants, and those that share features of fungi. No way did they all come from a single ancestor. Protista is a paraphyletic (para = near) kingdom, the group may exclude a member with a common ancestor. As such, the protists are a catch-all, those that don’t fit in some other kingdom. Protists are like pornography – hard to define, but you know it when you see it.


Classification isn’t perfect, some groups come from
different ancestors. A shows a group (in yellow) that
is monophyletic, they all come from one ancestor.
The paraphyletic group (B) shows that some groups
can’t include all descendents of a common ancestor.
And if a group is made from descendents of different
ancestors, it is called polyphyletic (C).
We already said that some behave like animals, plants, or fungi. Some are unicellular, some are multicellular, and some can be either. Some do photosynthesis, while some eat other organisms. How can you break these up into phyla, classes, orders, families, genera, and species when they are all so different?

You might do it by common ancestor; let their genes do the talking. We are learning more and more about who begot who – this is the study of cladistics. But if you break down protists into their clades – they don’t seem to make sense. Organisms that look or act similar might be in different clades, with wildly different organisms linked close together.

Alternatively, you might divide them up based on the characteristics, as Linneaus did - the animal-like protists in one phylum, the plant-like protozoans in another. But this may separate genetically related organisms into very different phyla. Same problem. How about by the way they get around? Some use flagella-like undulipodia, some use undulipodia called cilia, some use cytoplasmic crawling called pseudopodia, and others are immotile. Again, disparate organisms may be lumped together just based on their preferred mode of travel.

The idea of the "phylum" is to place the organisms in categories so that they are “more related to each other than they are to any other group.” Wow, that sounds scientific. Related based on what? We just discussed motility, genetics, and physical characteristics or behaviors.


The Kingdom Protista sits between the modern plants,
animals, and fungi, and the ancient prokaryotes. As such,
they end up being a catch all group. The right image
shows how some people group the protists based on
undulipodia characteristics, not ancestry.
And this assumes that we even know how related they are to each other and to organisms outside each phylum. Genome studies haven’t even begun to get close to establishing the ancestral relationships between all the organisms.

So we guess. And then we change things as new information becomes available. The work never ends, and the students never get to just memorize the categories.

As of today, some scientists classify protists based on a combination of the characteristics above. In the system I like best, there are 15 phyla, and we can roughly divide them as we show below. But there are six different phyla just for the protists that perform photosynthesis! The reason I like this system best -it roughly mimics the way they use undulipodia. And this is what we’re interested in today.

Kingdom Protista contains the organisms that seem to have made the most obvious uses of undulipodia. Eukaryotic flagella and cilia abound, some protists have both, and some have them only part of the time. There are six phylums of plant-like protists. Many have flagella, none that I could find have cilia. Here are some examples:


Pyrrophyta organisms will bloom and then bioluminesce
in order to scare predators away. Movement in the water
causes vesicles in the dinoflagellate to rupture via action
potential and release the reagents to make light. It’s exactly
the same system that fireflies use.
Phylum Pyrrhophyta – The dinoflagellates are in this phylum; they have two flagella, one from that side that beats and one on the posterior that whips more traditionally. Some species of this protist are responsible for the red tides that poison fish and can (and have) killed humans who eat the fish. Other dinoflagellates are bioluminescent and make the water appear to be on fire (hence the phylum pyrro = fire).
             
Phylum Euglenophyta – This phylum includes the Euglena gracilis organism shown in the animation at the beginning of the post. These protists also have two flagella, but one of them is reduced and doesn’t stick out. They have an eyespot, perhaps the genesis of our own eye. The eyespot helps them to move away from strong light sources, sources that would overheat them.

Euglena are common model organisms, on this world and in (near) space. They traveled on the parabolic flights to have their flagellar motions studied in zero gravity. The 2010 publication that resulted from the experiments showed that the process of beating is regulated and physiologic, as the change from hypergravity to microgravity stopped the flagellum from moving. The opposite change in gravity reoriented the cells and they started swimming to the bottom of their tank again.

The remaining phyla of plant-like protists can be included in a supergroup called the Chromista (colored organisms).  In terms of their undulipodia, the chromists tend to have two flagella, one on each end. The forward flagellum is usually longer and has lateral growths called mastigonemes. The best description for this type of flagellum is that it looks like Christmas tinsel.  The back flagellum is shorter and smooth.


These are the phyla of the Chromista; the colored protists.
Problem is, not all of them are colored and some colored
protists aren’t included in this group. Top right and bottom
left are the chlorophyta, the green algae. These are the most
recognizable algae. The bottom right is the diatoms, they have
the most interesting shapes. Look them up.
The Chrysophyta are the golden algae and diatoms. The diatoms are only flagellated when undergoing sexual reproduction, and is just the male gametes that have the flagella, sounds like male gametes in mammals doesn’t it?
  
Green algae are the ones we recognize; they belong to the Chlorophyta phylum. These are the ancestors of the land plants, and some have flagella in all stages, while others only have flagellated gametes.  We will see soon how some land plants still have flagellated gametes.

Brown algae belong to the Phaeophyta phylum. They are exceptional amongst the protists because every organism in this phylum is multicellular. No brown algae live as individual cells. Kelp is an example of brown algae. Kelp forests are multicellular example of brown algae thalli, growing to 40-60 m (130-200 ft) in height! Kelp forests are some of the most productive ecosystems on earth.      
The gametes of the brown algae are flagellated like in most of the other chromists. A 2014 study has started to look at the flagella of the chromists, using brown algae as the model organism. The study found that the flagella have functions in motility, signal transduction, and even metabolic activities.  The two different types of flagella had common proteins and proteins specific to each form, for a total of 495 different proteins associated with flagellar function and structure. For instance, only the posterior flagellum has a protein that senses blue light, and may be used for steering the organism. 


The Rhodophyta are where we get food stuffs. On the left
represents agar that can be used to make things that are like
Jello, it fills the role of the gelatin. In the middle, agar is also
used as a polysaccharide source of nutrition for growing
bacteria in the lab. On the right, nori is a rhodophyta
seaweed used in sushi.
Finally, Phylum Rhodophyta is the last of the Chromists. They are known as red algae, but you may know this protist better as seaweed. We saved them for last because they are the biggest exception in the plant-like protists.

If you’ve eaten Japanese sushi rolls, then you’ve eaten red algae in the nori that the rice and fish are wrapped in. Nori is made from several species of red algae of the genus Porphyra. Not a sushi fan? How about ice cream? Carageenans that make ice cream smooth also come from red algae.

Ice cream is reason enough to love the red algae, but there’s more. A 2014 study indicates that one compound found in the Porphyra is a strong antibiotic. Studies of 1,8-dihydroxy-anthraquinone from this red algae genus can disrupt the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus. This is hugely important, since many strains of S. aureus (like MRSA and VRSA) are now resistant to most existing antibiotics.

Rhodophyta algae are red because although they use some chlorophylls for photosynthesis, they also use phycoerythrins and phycocyanins. Interestingly, these are the same pigments that are present in the cyanobacteria. This suggests that there is an ancestral link. The link is supported by one other factoid. Both cyanobacteria and red algae lack undulipodia!


The seaweed Rhodophyta organisms often live in the tidal
pools. The spongy material in the stalks and “leaves” is the
agar and is related to the mucin product that attaches to the
male gametes as they are released. I couldn’t find a picture of
the gametes with their mucin tails, so this will have to do.
The male gametes of red algae are at a deficit; they don’t have flagella to swim toward the female eggs. They must relay on water movement to disperse them. An older study showed that when the male spermatia are released by the discharge from vesicles, the vesicle contents can hang on to the gametes and form mucin appendages. These are then more likely to be moved around by the water.

Whatever it is, the system seems to work. A 2014 study found that fertilization success was dependent on male organism biomass, but neared 100% when there were relatively few male gametes present. This was hypothesized to be possible because low tides in the tidal pools where the organisms live greatly increase the chances of male/female interaction and fertilization. Seaweed takes advantage of the moon’s effect on the tides to ensure reproductive success – who needs flagella!?

So far we have met protists that use flagella at some point in their life cycle (except for the red algae). Notice that none of them have used cilia. Next week, how about the animal-like protists? I bet there are some exceptions there as well.




Fu G, Nagasato C, Oka S, Cock JM, & Motomura T (2014). Proteomics Analysis of Heterogeneous Flagella in Brown Algae (Stramenopiles). Protist, 165 (5), 662-675 PMID: 25150613

Wei Y, Liu Q, Yu J, Feng Q, Zhao L, Song H, & Wang W (2014). Antibacterial mode of action of 1,8-dihydroxy-anthraquinone from Porphyra haitanensis against Staphylococcus aureus. Natural product research, 1-4 PMID: 25259418

Maggs CA, Fletcher HL, Fewer D, Loade L, Mineur F, & Johnson MP (2011). Speciation in red algae: members of the Ceramiales as model organisms. Integrative and comparative biology, 51 (3), 492-504 PMID: 21742776

Strauch SM, Richter P, Schuster M, & Häder DP (2010). The beating pattern of the flagellum of Euglena gracilis under altered gravity during parabolic flights. Journal of plant physiology, 167 (1), 41-6 PMID: 19679374




For more information or classroom activities, see:

Kingdom Protista –


Euglena –

Red tide –

Pyrrophyta –

Kelp –



Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Biodiversity Counts!

Biology concepts – biodiversity, kingdoms of life, animalia, plantae, fungi, protist, archaea, bacteria, extant, extinct

It seems that contests counting things in jars
always involve food. M&Ms, jellybeans, candies,
and gumballs are common things to estimate. I like
another estimate game – how many grains of sand
can be held in one human hand?
Amazingly, only about 10,000.
At some point in our lives, we have all tried to win the prize by guessing how many jellybeans are in the jar. Number estimation is a skill few people possess, just try ordering mulch by the square yard – you end up with either half as much as you need or buried in pine bark!

There is a large group of scientists playing the jellybean game for a living, but their jar is the entire earth. The jellybeans are species of organisms. The prize? Well, you don’t get to keep the jellybeans; and just how will we know who wins?

The Question of the Day – How many species of life are there on Earth?

It seems like a straight forward question, but let’s look at it in a bit more detail before we try to answer it.  What is it we're counting, animals? Animals and plants? Let’s include everything – everything that is considered alive. So what is considered alive? You can have a great discussion as to what should be considered alive, but for these purposes, let’s stick to the kingdoms of life as taught in every biology class – Archaea, Bacteria, Protists, Fungi, Plants, and Animals.

So now that we know the biodiversity we are assessing, we need to define our unit. We said above that we would count species, but it isn’t that simple. We have discussed before what constitutes a species in general – those animals that can breed and produce fertile offspring. So we don’t count ligers and tigons (crosses between tigers and lions), but should we count all the hybridizations of orchids? More than 24,000 species are named already, with about 800 added each year. For our purposes, and for most people estimating species, we will stick with those found in nature, unaided by man.

In 2012, Japanese botanists crossed two orchids and
created a new orchid. No big deal right, orchids are
crossed all the time. But this was the first time that a
photosynthesizing orchid was crossed with a purely
parasitic orchid that doesn’t perform photosynthesis.
They think the plants are doing some photosynthesis –
they’re pretty anyway. Is this a species we should
count in our estimate?
We are counting species, but is it live (extant) species or all species including those that are extinct? The World Wildlife Federation estimates that between 0.01% and 0.1% of all species go extinct each year. However many species we end up with as an estimate for all life on Earth, this is a huge number of species to lose EVERY YEAR. It is scary to think how many undiscovered species will go extinct this year. There must be thousands and thousands of species that we will never get to describe using a live specimen or discover how they might add to the diversity of the planet.

Scientists refer to “catalogued” species, but does that refer to those alive at the time the were described, or any species that has ever been described and named? Scientists estimate that extant species account for only 3% of everything that has lived on Earth, so including all species would greatly increased the overall number. However, in most estimates of species on Earth, the species being talked about are alive now, except for the one went extinct just this second, and the one that will go extinct two minutes from now, and the one….


The opposite action is also occurring; we discover new species every year. Most people think that perhaps a few new species are found each year, but it’s really in the thousands. The International Institute for Species Exploration (IISE) at Arizona State University publishes a list each year of the newly discovered species. For 2011 the list was more than 18,000 species long! You can see from the picture (below, right) that many discoveries were made in every kingdom of life in the decade of the 2000’s, more than 170,000 discoveries in all.

This graph shows the relative number of new species in many groups of
organisms. The scales are variable for each group and can’t be compared
amongst the groups. The trends show that in some groups, more and
more species are being discovered each year, while in others, fewer and
fewer are being found. In still others, some years a bunch are found and
some years provide few or no new species.
If 170,000 were discovered in ten years, the total number of species on Earth must be huge. Let’s break down the numbers of catalogued species and the estimates by kingdom.

Animalia – These are what most people think of when asked to name a species. Most animals are relatively big and can be seen in everyday life. The number of catalogued species includes the dinosaurs and humans, birds and sponges.  The numbers in each group vary greatly.

People love to study birds – so we have probably found a greater percentage of the total number of birds than we have worms. We have named about 10,000 species of birds, and more than 22,000 species of annelids (segmented worms). But there are probably many more annelids that we have not found as compared to birds. Therefore the estimate for annelids will be harder to make and perhaps less accurate.

For all animals, the total number of catalogued species by 2010 was 1.2 million. A recent paper (2011, Mora et al.) has predicted the number of species in most kingdoms based on several mathematical models. The authors predict that there are more than 9.9 million animal species on the Earth and in the oceans. According to this estimate, we have found only 12% of all the animals on Earth!

Meet the Giant Gippsland Earthworm 
(Megascolides australis). It can reach 3meters 
(10 feet) in length. First described in 1878, this 
worm lives in the deep clay soil in a small 
area in Australia. Similar worms live in North
America, but they are rarely observed.
Plantae – Plants include the non-vascular mosses, the vascular, spore-forming ferns and horsetails, the seed bearing gymnosperms (conifers and such) and the fruiting and flowering angiosperms. So many of these organisms are crucial for human life (medicine, food, oxygen!) we have done a good job of cataloguing them. The 2011 Mora paper surmises that we have already described nearly 50% of the total number of species.

Their methodology uses a lot of math to relate the number of higher taxa (phylums, orders, families) that are known in well-described kingdoms to the possible number in lesser studied groups. They found that there was a consistent pattern in which the more families there are now can be used to predict how many total genera there might be, and each level then can be used to predict the number in kingdoms for which the number of higher taxa are known. They also use methods to predict unknown higher taxa, so they can be included in the species estimate.

For plants, the Mora group predicts that there are 314,000 species extant on Earth. Other estimates also come out at about 300,000 species, but they include algae, which are actually protists, not plants.

Fungi – These organisms range from the invisible to the visible. In fact, in the paleoworld, fungi represented the largest organisms on Earth. Even today, the largest single organism is a fungus in the Malheur National Forest in Oregon, where a single 8,000 year old honey mushroom covers 2,200 acres (8,900 square meters) of land.

On the top is a fossilized prototaxite fungus in Saudi Arabia 
that once reached 20 ft (6 m) in height and was the tallest 
organism on the early Earth (this one is on its side). On the 
bottom is the national forest where a single honey mushroom mat 
has killed 2200 acres of trees. Each mushroom is a clone,
connected by a rhizoid mat just under the ground.
If you compare plant diversity to fungi, fungi win hands down. Described species of fungus lag behind; only 43,000 species have been named, but there is much more room to add new species. Estimates are that by the time we are done, whenever that is, we will have nearly 700,000 different mushrooms and other fungi.

Protista – Protists are a bit of a catch-all kingdom. Some have aspects that make them look like plants; they perform photosynthesis or they have central vacuoles. Others are much more animal-like. Overall, they are free-living organisms that are usually single celled or made up of many cells not forming tissues. Two examples show you the diversity in this group. Giant sea kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) is a type of brown algae that can grow at a rate of 2 ft/day and can reach a length of 300 ft (91.5 m), while picoplankton are 0.2 microns (0.00000002 m) in diameter, are single celled, and may or may not perform photosynthesis.

The estimates for the number of protists vary greatly. A 1998 study indicated that they had no reason to believe the total number of protist species would be greater than 3000. However, a 2005 report puts the estimate number anywhere from 140,000 to 1.6 million. The Mora group’s paper estimates that about 73,000 will be found; that’s 57,000 more than have been described as of 2010.

Archaea and Bacteria – These are the prokaryotes. They live in tar pits and arm pits; they own the planet and probably outer space as well. There are more bacteria in a scoop full of dirt then people who have ever lived on Earth. But for the purposes of our discussion today, the important part is that same scoop of dirt has thousands of undiscovered bacteria.

The J. Craig Venter Institute is leading the Global Ocean Sampling Expeditions to discover new marine microorganisms. A pilot expedition in 2003 identifed 1800 new species in just a couple of months. This was followed by global expeditions in 2005-2009 and an expedition to the European waterways in 2009-2010. They will analyzing the data and naming species for decades to come.

This map represents the expeditions of the Global Ocean Sampling Projects
of the Venter Institute. As they traveled, they would acquire 200-400 gallon
samples of water from different depths every 200 miles and put them
through a series of filters to catch smaller and smaller organisms. The filters
would be dried and used for DNA analysis. In just a couple of months, 1.2
million genes were identified using this methodology.
Most bacteria and archaea can’t be grown in the lab because we don’t know what they require to live. This makes them hard to describe and classify.  Therefore, the Venter Institute uses DNA techniques from dried whole organisms to identify new “species.”

But perhaps classification is not the proper term for these organisms. I talked to Dr. Mora about why prokaryotes were not analyzed to the same degree as other kingdoms in their paper.  He rightfully pointed out that species definitions don’t really apply to prokaryotes as neatly as they do other types of organisms.

Certainly they don’t conform to the mating and fertile offspring definition of species since they don’t mate. Also, since they swap DNA as usual business (lateral gene transfer), who is to say where one species stops and another begins.

Other sources are little more daring in projecting possible numbers of prokaryotes. It is possible that there are a billion distinct bacteria and archaea, but it more likely that the number is in the 10-20 million range.

What are our final numbers when add up all the estimates? Predicted species numbers for life on Earth range from 11.3 million in the Mora paper, to perhaps more than 1 billion if you include prokaryotes. If we leave the bacteria out of the equation, there could still be as many as 30,000,000 forms of life on the planet. We have described about 2 million (according to IISE), so only 28,000,000 left to find!


Mora, C., Tittensor, D., Adl, S., Simpson, A., & Worm, B. (2011). How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean? PLoS Biology, 9 (8) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127
 
ADL, S., SIMPSON, A., FARMER, M., ANDERSEN, R., ANDERSON, O., BARTA, J., BOWSER, S., BRUGEROLLE, G., FENSOME, R., FREDERICQ, S., JAMES, T., KARPOV, S., KUGRENS, P., KRUG, J., LANE, C., LEWIS, L., LODGE, J., LYNN, D., MANN, D., MCCOURT, R., MENDOZA, L., MOESTRUP, O., MOZLEY-STANDRIDGE, S., NERAD, T., SHEARER, C., SMIRNOV, A., SPIEGEL, F., & TAYLOR, M. (2005). The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 52 (5), 399-451 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x