Showing posts with label symmetry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label symmetry. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

Half Male, Half Female, Completely Weird

Biology concepts – sex determination system, gynandromorphs, non-disjunction, mitosis, bilateral symmetry, chimera, mosaicism



Ardhanarishvara is just form of the god Shiva.
As a male, he is considered the ultimate man,
James Garner mixed with a little Steve McQueen.
Parvati, his wife, wanted to share his experiences,
so he became half her. That’s one
progressive marriage.
In the Hindu faith, Shiva is the destroyer. Anything that has a beginning must have and end, so as Brahma made the world Shiva must destroy it so that it can be remade. On a more positive note, Shiva is also the god of change, making people better versions of themselves by destroying the ego and bad habits.

Shiva is male and celibate, although he has a female consort named Parvati (aka. Shakti, Devi, or Uma). There is also a deity called Ardhanarishvara, which is a half male/half female representation of Shiva + Parvati. The icon is found in most temples to Shiva, but this deity rarely has temples dedicated to him/herself.

Evolution chose to go the other way with nature. In more complex animals, the sexes are separated and join energies to reproduce. In biological terms, it’s a matter of increasing genetic diversity, the source of mutations and drift for natural selection.

However, like Ardhanarishvara, nature sometimes gives us a mixture; a normally two sex species will produce an individual that is part male and part female. And sometimes they're exactly half and half. This is going to take some explaining.

Every once in a while, some embryos have a mistake in mitosis. When the chromosomes line up for random assortment and portioning into the daughter cells, things can go wrong. Once in a while, two chromatids (the two copies of a replicated chromosome) may get pulled into the same daughter cell instead pulled apart with one going to each daughter (called a non-disjunction event).

This produces one cell with too many copies of that chromosome, and one cell with too few. Both outcomes can cause problems. Sometimes, the problem is just cosmetic; sometimes it’s deadly.


Gene loss can come from losing a part of one
chromosome, or you might lose the whole
chromosome (monosomy). It could occur from a
non-disjunction or from some toxic event. A 2015
study shows that smoking can cause a loss of the Y
chromosome in some cells. This makes men more
at risk for some cancers due to smoking (those
outside the lung).  Still want a cigarette?
On the other hand, on very rare occasions a chromosome will be lost during mitosis (chromosome loss event). It ends up next to that sock you can’t find in the washer. Who knows where it is – it just ain’t where it ought to be. One daughter cell has the right number of chromosomes and the other has one too few. Again, the consequences can range from small to really big.

A third possibility exists, where a mutation occurs in one chromatid after replication, so that even if the mitosis is normal (which it almost always is) one daughter will have a mutation (one normal and one mutated gene on the two chromosomes of the same type) and the other won’t (two normal genes on two normal chromosomes).

From then on, every time the daughter cells divide they increase the number of mutated and normal cells. The animal, if it survives to be born, will be a chimera (a mixture of two genotypes). The original chimera was a Greek mythical figure made from the parts of many animals and which breathed fire. It was a half-brother to the Hydra and Cerberus, the three-headed dog. Here it means something less menacing, but just as interesting.

Special circumstances can bring special kinds of chimeras. Which type is formed depends on when the mutation, non-disjunction, or chromosome loss occurs. In some animals, the first cell division after fertilization establishes right and left halves of the animal. Every progeny cell from one of the first daughters will be one side of the body, while every cell coming from the other original daughter will be on the other half of the animal.


The lobster on the top is a mosaic, the mutation
which changed the pigment occurred at a point when
some mutated and some non-mutated cells were on
each bilateral half of the embryo, so there are patches
of each. The bottom version had a mutation that
occurred precisely as the embryo was determining
right and left sides.
If the chromosome change or gene mutation occurs at this point, then exactly one half of the animal will have the change and the other half won’t. This is a bilateral chimera. On the other hand, of the mutation/change occurs at some other point, the there will be patches of one type of cell and patches of the other. This is called a mosaic (see picture to the right).

A 2013 review talks about mutations in different populations of cells and the right left isolation of some mutations. The authors point out that in bilateral chimeras, it is easy to study subtle effects of the gene mutation – one half displays the mutation, and the other half doesn’t. A single animal (could be a person) can serve as the experimental model AND  the control.

For example, in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) the males are XY and the females are XX. If there was chromosome loss early in development, with a single X lost in one daughter cell, there will be XX daughter cells and X (called X0) daughter cells. X0 cells are male because the primary sex determining is located on the X chromosome. In this case just described, the XX cells are female and the X0 cells are male, in the same animal!

This animal would be a gynandromorph chimera. The word is very telling, since gyno = female and andro = male. This is different from a hermaphrodite. The hermaphroditic animal has two sets of genitalia, one female and one male (whether they work or not is another question). In a gynandromorph, the two cell populations of the entire animal show different sex chromosomes.


The patterning on the thorax and abdomen is a bit
hard to see, but the eyes are easily picked out on the
gynandromorphic fruit fly. The pigment genes are
on the sex chromosome.
Gynandromorphs are extremely rare. In fact, they have been demonstrated in only two groups, but this is preliminary. Remember how we talked about animal sexual dimorphism a few weeks ago? Well, it’s only in sexual dimorphic animal species that you would actually notice gynandromorphs (of course, there are exceptions).  

Birds and arthropods are the two animal groups where we have seen gynandromorphs. We gave the example of fruit flies above. You can check out the picture of one to the left. This is specific example of gynandromorph, a bilateral gynandromorph. The left side is female and the right half is male.

In different systems of embryonic development, chimeras can develop side to side (bilateral), front to back (polar), or corner to corner (oblique). This is if the mutation or change in chromosome or gene number takes place at exactly the right mitotic event that divides an animal. If it is any of the other time, the animal will be a mosaic.

In the bilateral gynandromorphic fruit fly above, the color of the eyes is different on each side, as is the body coloring and some other characteristics. This is because the secondary sex characteristics that determine sexual dimorphism are linked to the sex chromosomes.


Spiders have funky sex-determination systems, but
they can still have gynandromorphs. The coloring is
different, but there’s more. It is hard to see, but only
the male side (purplish) has the palp organ growing
on the second appendage for the transfer of
reproductive cells. Image via: spider silk stockings
But wait – normal male and female fruit flies both have red eyes. Here one is red but the other is white. That’s because the gene for eye color and body color pattern in fruit flies is carried on the X chromosome too. If the loss of a chromosome leaves that side of the body with only one X (XO male) and the X it has carries the recessive white eye color gene, then that eye will be white. The other half (XX female) might have dominant red and recessive white eye genes on its two X chromosomes, so that eye would be red.

Is a bilateral difference in coloration enough to call an animal bilaterally asymmetric? They are phenotypically (how they look outwardly) asymmetric, but you cut them in half the silhouettes would be exactly the same (body plan is still symmetric). You can argue amongst yourselves as to what makes an animal bilaterally asymmetric.

Gynandromorphs in vertebrates are extremely rare. The reason for this is that sex characteristics aren’t only controlled by genes on the sex chromosomes. They are also under the control of hormones. But gynandromorphy does occur in birds – they’re vertebrates, but different somehow. No one is quite sure why gynandromorphs are possible for them.

It could be that the mistake comes when multiple male reproductive cells are successful in fertilizing one egg cell. When the fertilized egg cell divides, the daughters would probably be asymmetric with respect to sex chromosomes. Since the sex chromosomes control the production of the reproductive organs, and those organs then make the hormones, you can see how the two are linked.


The gynandromorphic chicken on the left is more a
mosaic than completely bilateral. The male side (your
right) has bigger breast muscle, leg spur, bigger wattle
and white feathers (see the sporadic darker feathers –
it’s a mosaic). A 2010 study showed that if you
transplanted male cells on to the female side, they
retained their secondary sex characteristics –hormones
ain’t everything. The cardinal on the right is striking –
the perfect Ball State University mascot.
The key is in determining which of the sexually dimorphic traits are under strictly genetic control and which are under hormonal control. A study in a gynandromorphic finch in 2003 showed that not everything is hormones. The brains of the males and females are different (in part this determines the song the bird sings) and gynandromorphic finches have brains that are half male and half female in structure. Even with hormones that circulate throughout the body, the brains are still different. The finch of the study sang a male song and mated with a female (no offspring). The male behaviors were controlled by the male part of the brain.

A very rare gynandromorphic cardinal was spotted and subsequently studied for 40 days from afar. The paper reporting this study stated that the bird never sang, never drew the attention of other birds, and never mated. It was a complete loner. But could he/she mate?

Most female birds have one horn of the uterus (left side) that is functional while the other is small and nonfunctional (makes them lighter for flight). Male birds usually have one long testis that is functional, the right one. Since neither male or female birds (most of them) have external reproductive organs, then a gynandromorph bird where the left half is female and the right half is male might actually have a shot at being fertile. It would all depend on how the hormone battle played out.

However, gynandromorphs in mammals don’t happen. The sex hormones control too much of the systems and flow throughout entire body, so you can’t really keep secondary sex characteristics limited to a geographically determined set of cells, even if the sex chromosomes are different in the cells.


Butterflies show sexual dichromatism (different colors
in males and females) and well as different morphologies
of wing (shapes), The gynandromorphs display both, so
they are truly bilaterally asymmetric. Butterflies have an
XX and XY (XO) sex determination system like fruitflies,
except here the XX’s are male.
But there are some characteristics that are hormone independent. Some sex characteristics are set BEFORE the sex determining genes on the sex chromosomes are turned on (reviewed here). The sex characteristic is a default, and therefore is seen both males and females despite later hormone differences. That’s why men have nipples. Nippled is the default state, no nipples isn’t possible. And three nipples is just weird.

The example I like to give for the bilateral gynandromorphy that shows true bilateral asymmetry is butterflies. The male and female often have different coloration and wing shape. This makes them sexually dichromatic within one animal but also bilaterally asymmetric.

Next week we’ll back to the butterflies and asymmetry. There’s one butterfly who is attractive to the girls precisely because he’s asymmetric.



Renfree, M., Chew, K., & Shaw, G. (2014). Hormone-Independent Pathways of Sexual Differentiation Sexual Development, 8 (5), 327-336 DOI: 10.1159/000358447

Dumanski, J., Rasi, C., Lonn, M., Davies, H., Ingelsson, M., Giedraitis, V., Lannfelt, L., Magnusson, P., Lindgren, C., Morris, A., Cesarini, D., Johannesson, M., Tiensuu Janson, E., Lind, L., Pedersen, N., Ingelsson, E., & Forsberg, L. (2014). Smoking is associated with mosaic loss of chromosome Y Science, 347 (6217), 81-83 DOI: 10.1126/science.1262092

Zhao, D., McBride, D., Nandi, S., McQueen, H., McGrew, M., Hocking, P., Lewis, P., Sang, H., & Clinton, M. (2010). Somatic sex identity is cell autonomous in the chicken Nature, 464 (7286), 237-242 DOI: 10.1038/nature08852

Peer, B., & Motz, R. (2014). Observations of a Bilateral Gynandromorph Northern Cardinal ( ) The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 126 (4), 778-781 DOI: 10.1676/14-025.1

Ma, K. (2013). Embryonic left-right separation mechanism allows confinement of mutation-induced phenotypes to one lateral body half of bilaterians American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161 (12), 3095-3114 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36188




For more information or classroom activities, see:

Sex-determination system –

Gynandromorphy -



Wednesday, April 1, 2015

The Bird Jaws of Life

Biology concepts – ecology, radiative speciation, talpid, tomia, temporomandibular joint, cranial kinesis, bilateral symmetry, asymmetry


You’ve heard the phrase, “As scarce as hen’s teeth?” Well, you’ve heard it if you’re as old as I. Hens don’t have teeth, so the phrase means something so rare as to be fictitious. Sort of like Will Ferrell’s chances of winning an Oscar.


Chicks don’t’ peck their way out of their shell. They
use an egg tooth to pip the shell, putting a small hole
in it. This destroys the integrity of the shell, and
they can push their way out.
Are there are any birds with teeth? They would be an exception, and that’s what this blog is all about. Maybe they just don’t have a lot to smile about. Birds are edentulous – without teeth.

Most chicks do have an egg tooth, but it’s not really a tooth. An egg tooth is a small growth on the tip of a bird’s beak just before it hatches. The chick’s talons and beak aren’t sharp enough to break through the egg, so the egg tooth does the job. They pip the outer shell (just break through) and push themselves out.

Of course, that’s how it usually works. There are of course, exceptions. The kiwi bird of New Zealand doesn’t produce an egg tooth. It uses its strong legs – even in the shell they are strong – to kick it’s way out of the shell. A few of the other large birds of Australia do it as well. No teeth here.

There are a few species of birds that look like they have teeth as adults. Anyone who has crossed paths with a Canada Goose with goslings probably knows that they can be toothy trouble makers. Called tomia, geese teeth these look a little like snake teeth; not the fangs, just the teeth. They slope backward to help grasp food.

Tomia aren’t covered with enamel and they don’t have a pulp chamber, so they are definitely not teeth. These serrations (serrated beaks) are made from the same material as the beak itself, and the rubbing of the top and bottom bills keep them sharp. Tomia are good for cutting and grasping, but they are more like fingernails or bone, not teeth.


These are the tomia of a domestic goose. They look
formidable. Tomia are located on the lower and
upper jaws, but also on the roof of the moth and the
tongue. See how they are pointed backward to help
grip things. But they aren’t teeth!
Birds have a common ancestor with dinosaurs, and dinosaurs had teeth. T. Rex himself is a direct ancestor of today’s birds, and boy did he have teeth! The genes to make teeth are still there in birds, they’ve just been turned off.

The common ancestor of all living birds did have teeth, according to new work from UC Riverside. Birds don’t really fossilize well since their bones are so light, so the six genes of teeth production will have to do for study. Did all birds lose teeth in one fell swoop, or did different lines of birds lose teeth independently, at different times?

The researchers found that genes in all birds had the same mutations, so all birds lost their enamel, and therefore their teeth, about 116 million years ago.

Another way we know that the tooth making genes are still there – sometimes they come back! There are chickens that show a certain group of mutations – they grow true teeth. Don’t get too excited, the mutations also kill them before they hatch. The mutation is called talpid, and involves the beta-catenin gene.

A 2006 study showed that teeth of the mutant embryos were very alligator like teeth buds, and turning on beta-catenin in normal embryos brings the same tooth development. Yep, birds used to have teeth and still have them buried deep in their genes.


For some reason, anatomists call the two jaws of man
a mandible (bottom) and a maxilla (top), but the two
jaws of a bird just upper and lower mandibles. See
how much more complex the human jaw joint as
compared to the bird. Also, see how close the human
joint is to your ear, that’s why you hear yourself chew.
The toothiness of ancient birds is just the beginning. Birds have some bizarre mouths as well. In humans, the mandible (bottom jaw) houses the most complex joint in our body. The tempromandibular joint (TMJ, between the temporal bone of the skull and the mandible) can move front and back, hinge up and down, and move down and forward laterally. It’s the only joint in the body that can do all these moves. On the other hand, our maxilla (upper jaw) is completely fixed, it doesn’t move at all.

However, in most birds the upper mandible (our maxilla) can move! The attachment to the facial bones is more complicated in birds than in mammals, the upper mandible attaches to the facial bones via some cartilage, called a syndesmosis joint. There are several types of movement based on just where the upper mandible is attached to the facial bones.

Being able to move the upper jaw is call cranial kinesis (cranial = upper jaw makes up part of the cranium or skull, and kinesis =moving). Snakes are big on cranial kinesis, they need it to eat things bigger than their head. But mammals can’t do it.


Cute yes, but you should pay attention to the top
part of the beak. It moves independently of the lower
mandible. We can’t do that. It’s called cranial kinesis
when the upper jaw can hinge against the facial bones,
and parrots are the birds that do it best.
Mammals and some other animals have developed a secondary palate made of bone. This affixes the maxilla tightly to the skull; there’s no way to get any movement out of it. The secondary palate is a consequence of needing to breathe while eating (necessary because of our high metabolism) and as a result of needing to develop suction for drinking milk as babies.

As far as birds go, many species move their upper jaw a bit, but the parrots move it the most. This helps then to eat the large and oddly shaped nuts that make up their diet. But oddly enough, they don’t move their lower jaw much side to side. Herbivores do, they have flat back teeth for grinding (see picture below).

Since birds don’t have teeth to chew food, they don’t really need to move their lower jaw laterally very much. This is true for most birds, but there is one exceptional genus of birds that can move their jaws laterally quite a bit - and they have to. Their bills grow sideways and cross each other like scissors!


Herbivores use lots of lateral mandiblular movement
to help grind their food. Birds have no teeth, so they
don’t move their jaws lateral much at all.
There are about 5 species of crossbill finches, all of the genus Loxia (Greek for oblique). They are the only birds whose upper and lower bills cross one other. One grows to the right so it can pass the other (which moves to the left). In populations of each species, the dextral individuals (bottom jaw crosses to the right of the upper) are about 1:1 with sinistral individuals (bottom jaw is on the left).

This makes the crossbill bilaterally asymmetric, and the top bill is longer than the bottom, assuring this asymmetry. Why did this crossed bill evolve? It’s based on what they eat. The diet of crossbills consists only of conifer seeds, harvested straight from the maturing cones. Each species dines on the seeds of different conifers, so their bills are slightly different based on what they are digging out.

The top image is the Hispaniola crossbill. This picture
shows the crossing of the upper and lower jaws. This
individual is a dextral crossbill. The lower picture is a
red crossbill feeding. Look carefully at the beak as it is
pushing the scales of the cone apart. The crossbill
moves its lower jaw laterally more than any other bird.
The crossbill turns his head to the side and inserts the crossed bill between two scales on a cone. He moves the lower mandible laterally while turning the head a bit back to vertical. This pries the scales open while it opens the mouth. When the space is wide enough, the tongue shoots out and grabs the exposed seeds. See the video at the end of the post.

Each bird attacks the cone based on which type of crossed bill it has, dextral or sinistral. Therefore, each bird can only access about half the seeds of a cone. This is why populations are 1:1 dextral/sinistral – it allows any population to get at all the seeds. If one morph (dextral or sinistral) predominated, some would starve. Having 1:1 ratio allows both morphs to feed maximally.

Different conifers have differently shaped cones. Over evolutionary time, individual differences were maximized until different species resulted. This allows different populations to live in the same area, because they feed on different trees. Called adaptive radiation, Darwin’s finches did it in the Galapagos Islands because of isolation and different foods. Here the crossbill species do it with in the same area to fill different feeding niches.


Some portion of the instructions for the crossing bill
is genetic, but how much? Look at the chick’s bill. It
isn’t crossed yet. They don’t cross until they are ready
to feed on their own. Is it an acquired characteristic?
Species have different bills, but so do individuals within a population, they are just smaller differences. A study in 2009 showed for the first time that differences in feeding ability of crossbills, based on individual differences (fluctuating asymmetry, will talk more about it in a couple weeks) in bill shape, may be used in mate selection. Those that are able to forage fastest seem to draw the attention of more females, and for longer times.

A second study indicates that differently individuals have different contact calls, and those with the most similar bills would respond best to each other’s calls. This would reinforce mating choice by assortative flocking. Feeding and calling based on bill morphology are two reasons behind ecological speciation in crossbills.

The above evidence of mate selection and radiative adaption suggest that bill shape is genetic, but it isn’t totally genetic. Chicks are born with straight bills, but they bend and cross at some point before the chick is required to search out food for itself. And a 2005 study found no evidence for simple or gender-based inheritance when examining captive bred versus will crossbills. More research is obviously needed.


The wrybill of New Zealand is the only bird in the world
with a beak that bends sideways. It is bilaterally
asymmetric like the crossbill, but in a somewhat weirder
way. It’s supposed to help find food, but other birds
with straight bill find just as much food in the rocks
as they do.
There is one bird that is even more asymmetric than the crossbills. The wrybill (Anarhynchus frontalis; wry is Old English for contorted) lives on the islands of New Zealand. Many birds have bills that bend up or down (or even cross), but this is the only bird whose bill turns to the side – always the right.

A single species of plover, the wrybill (Ngutuapore in native Maori language) is rare; only 5000 live on the North Island and fly to the South Island to breed each year. The turned bill is supposed to be for turning stones over and retrieving crustaceans, worms, and insects from the crevices of shore rocks.

However, the wrybill has been studied very little, and other wading birds do just as well at turning stones over, so the reason for the bill turn isn't understood. We don’t even know just how or if it is an adaptive advantage. Even if we don't know why it exists, it must play some role – the turn is ALWAYS to the right, and even the unhatched chicks have the turned bill. We’ll have to wait for the next turn in their story.

Next week - if we want to continue talking about bilateral asymmetry, we first have to talk about how males and females look different - well some do. But in animals like spotted hyenas, even the experts can tell the guys from the gals.





Meredith, R., Zhang, G., Gilbert, M., Jarvis, E., & Springer, M. (2014). Evidence for a single loss of mineralized teeth in the common avian ancestor Science, 346 (6215), 1254390-1254390 DOI: 10.1126/science.1254390

Smith, J., Sjoberg, S., Mueller, M., & Benkman, C. (2012). Assortative flocking in crossbills and implications for ecological speciation Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279 (1745), 4223-4229 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1500

Benkman, C., Parchman, T., & Mezquida, E. (2010). Patterns of coevolution in the adaptive radiation of crossbills Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1206 (1), 1-16 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05702.x

SNOWBERG, L., & BENKMAN, C. (2009). Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22 (4), 762-769 DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01699.x




For more information or classroom activities, see:

Tomia –

Crossbill –

Wrybill –

Cranial kinesis –

Radiative adaptation -



Wednesday, March 18, 2015

The Search For The Unicorn - Slightly Off Center

Biology concepts – teeth, narwhals, unicorns, bilateral symmetry, evolution, mechanosensing, asymmetry



The movie Legend starred Tom Cruise and Mia Sara,
as well as a bunch of little people – you know, actors
that were small, not small actors. The unicorn pair
represented light and goodness, and kept the devil
at bay. Until Mia got cocky and touched one. Then
Cruise had to save the day.
It’s no secret that some pretty odd and awful stories have come out of North Korea in the past few years. Kim Jung Un and his recent ancestors have done some amazing things….. supposedly. Un’s father, Kim Jung Il apparently invented the hamburger, and he shot 11 hole-in-ones in his first round of golf.

Not to be outdone, Kim Jung Un made an amazing announcement in 2012. He and his archeologists discovered a unicorn lair. Yep, North Korea’s twenty-something leader proved the existence of unicorns. The lair was supposedly the resting place of the unicorn ridden by the great King Dongmyeong, around the year 0 CE.

The earliest writings that describe unicorns were those of the Greek, Ctesias, in the late 5th century BCE. He described the Indian Ass, an animal with a white, strong body and perhaps a red head from which sprung a long single horn of red, white, and black. It was said that a cup made from the horn could neutralize any poison.


There are real animals with one horn, like the
unicorn leatherjacket fish in the top left, and the
Indian rhinoceros at the bottom left. The rhinoceros
beetle has one big horn and fairly large part of his
jaw below, so I don’t know if he counts. On the top
right is the Meller’s chameleon. They say he a has a
horn on his nose, but you have to look close and
want to see it.
Four hundred and fifty years later, Pliny the Elder, historian of Rome, also wrote about a very strong animal with a single horn protruding from its forehead. He described an oryx (an antelope with a single horn), an Indian Ox (probably a rhinoceros – rhino = nose and ceros = horn), and the same Indian Ass with a horse-like build and a single horn.

Pliny wrote, “The unicorn (uni = one, and ceros = horn) is the fiercest animal, and it is said that it is impossible to capture one alive. It has the body of a horse, the head of a stag, the feet of an elephant, the tail of a boar, and a single black horn three feet long in the middle of its forehead. Its cry is a deep bellow.” Uh-huh. That doesn’t sound much like an antelope or a rhino, so I guess he meant the Indian Ass.

Soon, Romans were trading long spiral tusks, but no one was telling where exactly they had come from. These “unicorn” horns were snow white with a tight spiral. As a result of these horns, the unicorn in the West settled down to be a pure white horse with a very long, pure white, spiraled horn. This is the image we generally see in tapestries and illustrations.


Kirin Beer from Japan uses a unicorn (kirin) as its
logo. Look closely and you can see the single
horn on its head.
In the Far East there were unicorns as well. Known as the qilin (pronounced chee-lin) in China, there was a version in Japan too, the kirin. This was a benevolent animal, with shiny scales like a dragon and one or perhaps two horns. It avoided fighting and walked so softly that it would not disturb or harm a blade of grass. An animal like this (perhaps the saola) is most likely the one referred to in the North Korea stories.

But what about real life? Most likely, those horns in the Roman markets were really narwhal tusks, as discussed in a 2011 paper. It is very likely that the narwhal played into the unicorn legend, as their tusks could be offered as concrete proof of unicorn existence.

The narwhal (Monodon monoceros) is an amazing animal, and fits into our recent theme of animals that abandon bilateral symmetry. Monodon means one tooth, and monoceros means one horn; a pretty accurate name, all in all.


Our post today uncovers many of the problems
with these cartoon narwhals. Yes, they love where
there is ice. But they don’t have all those teeth, the
tusk isn’t centered and doesn’t come out of their
forehead, and they don’t have a dorsal fin
to speak of.
Narwhals are a species of whale, meaning that they are mammals. They live way up north. From Baffin Bay, around Greenland, to the north of Russian, they swim in pods of 10-100, but you’ll rarely see them even if you live near there. There are perhaps 45,000-50,000 narwhals today.

This is a steady number because it’s so hard to get to where they live. Consequently, narwhals haven’t been hunted into extinction. They spend a lot of their time on deep dives under the ice floes, so they aren’t seen often. No narwhal has ever been seen feeding; we only know what they eat from examining stomach contents.

Their most distinctive feature is the long (up to 10 ft/3 m) tusk on the males. Just one tusk, mind you, like a unicorn horn. The narwhal tusk - like elephant, walrus or warthog tusks - is a tooth.

Very young narwhals have six maxillary (upper jaw) tooth buds and two pairs of tooth buds in the lower jaw (mandible). However, only one pair develops any further. A tooth bud is what you find on an X-ray of a child (see picture).


You can see the teeth developing from crown to
root in the darker tooth buds. The pulp is usually
dark, but the middle tooth has had a root canal
and a filling has been placed in the whole pulp
chamber. The large tooth to eh left is the first
molar. It doesn’t have a baby tooth to push out
of its way.
Teeth form in the jawbones as tooth buds. Most narwhal teeth never go past the tooth bud stage, but occasionally a tooth will erupt where one shouldn’t. These are often misshapen or caught between the bone and the palate, or in the wrong place. This is all good evidence that the teeth are vestigial; they serve no functional purpose for the normal narwhal.

Just one tooth, almost always the left cuspid (most people call it a canine), does develop. Hold on though, it isn’t that simple. Instead of developing in a vertically directed tooth bud and erupting down through the jaw, the left canine stays horizontal and erupt right through the front of the jaw and through the narwhals lip!

Since the tusk is derived from the left cuspid, it erupts left of center, making the narwhal bilaterally asymmetric! A 2012 study showed that the bony attachment and length proves that the narwhal tusk is a canine, not an incisor as so many people think. But, it’s not just the location that makes the narwhal tusk amazing, it’s how it’s made and what it can do.

A 1988 study suggests that the tight spiral as it grows keep the tusk from curving. A curved tusk would make it hard of the narwhal to swim in a straight line. Whatever the reason, the spiral is an iconic image for both narwhals and unicorns.


The top image shows how the narwhal tusk is off
center. The bottom image is my analogy. The tusk
is offset like a knight with his jousting lance. This
is Heath Ledger in A Knight’s Tale. Um….why isn’t
he wearing armor?
Despite being a tooth, the tusk is quite flexible. It can bend up to a foot (0.3 m) in any direction without breaking. It’s awfully long, we said 10 ft. above, but most are in the 8-9 foot range. This is huge when you think that most male narwhals are only about 15 foot long in the body.

Teeth are normally built with the hard enamel on the outside. Enamel is harder than bone and protects the teeth from breakage when chewing. The mouth is a rough environment and teeth have to put up with a lot of abuse.

Deep to the enamel is a material called dentin. This stuff has a lot of similarity to bone, although it isn’t quite as hard and doesn’t have living cells within it (like osteocytes – see this post). The dentin does contain millions of tubules that go from the enamel junction all the way to the pulp in the center. The pulp has a nerve and blood vessels.

The dentinal tubules have fluid and small processes of the neuron in them. When you eat something cold or have a cavity, the fluid in these tubules moves and changes the pressure in the pulp chamber. The single neuron in the tooth is a pain neuron, so any pressure change is interpreted by your brain as pain. It teaches you to take care of your teeth, but it ain’t the most pleasant of all evolutionary adaptations.


The cartoon on the left shows the enamel crown
covering the dentin and the dentinal tubules.
Inside the tubules are the odontoblasts that lay
down dentin all during the life of the tooth and the
nerves that go into the tubules. The right image is
an electron photomicrograph of the tubules.
The narwhal tusk is different. It is the only tooth known that has the dentin on the outside, although a 1987 study showed that it has no enamel, so it isn’t really an inside out tooth. The dentin is covered by a thin layer of cementum. This is what normally covers the roots of the teeth and helps attach them to bone. The dentin of the narwhal tusk has about 10 million of those tubules, but it is different from human dentin.

A 1990 study compared calcium content and hardness between human teeth and narwhals. The narwhal cementum was more mineralized than human, but the dentin of narwhals was less mineralized than human dentin and was softer. This may be why the narwhal tusk is so flexible.

The tubules of the narwhal tusk dentin connect to channels in the cementum, so there is a communication to the outside. A group in 2014 showed this and used the information to hypothesize that the tusk is a mechanosensor. Experiments showed that their heart rate changed when the water touching the tusk was switched from freshwater to salt water. They hypothesize that the tusk senses temperature, salinity, pressure, and perhaps touch to help in navigation and hunting.

But if that’s the case, why do only males have them? Females have to hunt too. The group from the 2014 paper offers that males and females have sexually dimorphic foraging techniques – they eat different things and hunt differently, so females don’t need horns. This is not well-supported. Many scientists believe the long tusk is a sign of health and genes and is therefore an ornament for mate selection.


The dorsal fin of the narwhal is greatly reduced. It
has notches that scientists hop to use to identify
individuals. The lack of a dorsal fin is believed to
be so they don’t injure it on the under side of the
ice floes when they surface, but it could also be so
they don’t run it into the ocean floor as they feed
upside down.
Occasionally, one will see females with a tusk, but like with many tusked females (elephants, etc), they are usually shorter. You can also find narwhal males with two tusks. But two tusks doesn’t mean that they are returned to bilateral symmetry. Both tusks spiral to the left! There must be some strong left-hand genes at work.

One last thing. The offset tusk lead to another weird narwhal behavior. A group in 2007 put cameras and positional monitors on some narwhals and found that they tend to swim upside down a lot. Almost 70% of their time on the ocean floor was spent in the supine position. Since the tusk points down just slightly, scientists believe they hunt upside down so that the tusk won’t get stuck in the ocean floor and break! The tusk must be pretty important - or they just like lounging on their backs.

Next week – another whale has become asymmetric, but in a completely different way. This time, it’s the nose that goes.



Christen AG, & Christen JA (2011). The unicorn and the narwhal: a tale of the tooth. Journal of the history of dentistry, 59 (3), 135-42 PMID: 22372187

Kingsley, M., & Ramsay, M. (1988). The Spiral in the Tusk of the Narwhal ARCTIC, 41 (3) DOI: 10.14430/arctic1723

Nweeia, M., Eichmiller, F., Hauschka, P., Donahue, G., Orr, J., Ferguson, S., Watt, C., Mead, J., Potter, C., Dietz, R., Giuseppetti, A., Black, S., Trachtenberg, A., & Kuo, W. (2014). Sensory ability in the narwhal tooth organ system The Anatomical Record, 297 (4), 599-617 DOI: 10.1002/ar.22886

Dietz, R., Shapiro, A., Bakhtiari, M., Orr, J., Tyack, P., Richard, P., Eskesen, I., & Marshall, G. (2007). Upside-down swimming behaviour of free-ranging narwhals BMC Ecology, 7 (1) DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-7-14




For more information or classroom activities, see:

Narwhals –

Tooth structure –